EVALUATION

Recommendations

Info

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF Fault Level Management • Fault Level Active Response (FLARE). • FlexDGrid. Flexible Demand • Capacity to Customers (C2C). • Flexible Approaches to Low Carbon Optimised Networks (FALCON). • My Electric Avenue. • Solent Achieving Value for Efficiency (SAVE). • Low Carbon London. • Venerable Customers Energy Efficiency. Asset Rating • Flexible Networks for a Low Carbon Future. Storage • Sola BRISTOL. • Smarter Network Storage (SNS). Network Configuration • Low Energy Automated Networks (LEAN). • Flexible Urban Networks (FUN) LV. Visibility • LV Network templates. • Smart Street (ETA). • New Thames Valley Vision. Voltage Control • CLASS. • Customer Lead Network Revolution (CLNR). PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING October 2016 713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx 184
AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF D.3 Tier 2 evaluation criteria Tier 2 evaluation criteria 1a 1b 2 3 4 5 Weighting 6 4 2 5 3 Has the potential to deliver net Effective project methodology, Accelerates the development of a Generates knowledge that can be Involvement of other partners Title financial benefits to future Relevance and timing and effectiveness of low carbon energy sector shared amongst all DNOs and external funding and/or existing customers implementation Score 5 descriptor Score 4 descriptor Score 3 descriptor Score 2 descriptor The project clearly facilitates the connection of low carbon generation or demand. The carbon benefits are credible and quantified. The project clearly facilitates the connection of low carbon generation or demand. The carbon benefits not specifically quantified OR The project clearly facilitates one of the carbon benefits: Provide reactive power services/ Provide frequency response service/Defer asset reinforcement. The carbon benefits are credible and quantified Compelling evidence that the project is highly likely to deliver significant financial benefits in the long term (ED2 and beyond) to the majority of customers Compelling evidence that the project is highly likely to deliver significant financial benefits in the long term (ED2 and beyond) to selected group of customers The project clearly facilitates one of Evidence that the project is highly the carbon benefits: Provide reactive likely to deliver financial benefits to power services/ Provide frequency the majority of customers, but that response service/Defer asset these benefits are comparatively reinforcement. short term (e.g. associated with The carbon benefits not specifically asset replacement deferment) quantified The project just demonstrates carbon benefit with respect to increasing energy efficiency. Specific replication report(s) exist. These cover the main technical / commercial / stakeholder aspects as applicable. A learning dissemination event or webinar was held. Specific replication report(s) exist. These cover the main technical / commercial / stakeholder aspects as applicable. There is no evidence of a learning dissemination event or webinar. A learning dissemination event or webinar was held but there are no specific replication reports Evidence that the project may deliver short-term financial benefits The only replication information to a limited group of customers (e.g. available is in the closedown report. associated with asset replacement deferment) The project involved a wide range of external partners covering the main technical /commercial / stakeholder aspects as applicable External funding for > 10% of the project was obtained. The project involved some external partners covering some of the main technical /commercial / stakeholder aspects as applicable. The project included one external partner covering some of the main technical / commercial / stakeholder aspects as applicable The project included one external partner covering one specific aspect. The project has been / is ready to roll out into BAU. Other DNOs have included the project in their business plans. The project has been /is ready to roll out into BAU. The project has a high likelihood of being replicated by other DNOs. The project is ready to roll out when the energy landscape requires the solution The project has a reasonable likelihood of being replicated by other DNOs The project has been / is ready to roll out into BAU when the energy landscape requires the solution The project has potential for replication in niche situations or by third parties. The project achieved all its successful delivery reward criteria (SDRC) and the variance was 10%,however the variance was >10% The project achieved all its successful delivery reward criteria (SDRC) but has an overspend of > 10% The project achieved >80% of its SDRCs Score 1 descriptor The project does not clearly demonstrate any carbon benefits. Little or no evidence that the project will deliver any significant benefit to customers at any time in future No dissemination or replication documentation is evident. The project did not involve any external partners. This is a one off project with no potential for future replication. The project achieved
Page 1 and 2:
AN INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF THE LC
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138: AN INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF THE LC
Page 187: AN INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF THE LC
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
show all

EVALUATION

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?