01.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF<br />

Community Energy Action<br />

Project Title<br />

Community Energy Action<br />

Tier 1<br />

DNO<br />

WPD<br />

Status<br />

Complete<br />

LCNF project funding £434,565<br />

Project objectives The scope of this project was to work with 10 communities to gather demand data while implementing incentive tariffs. This<br />

would be aided by community demand data being made available. In addition to this a community energy monitor would be<br />

developed to allow customers to see at a glance what their demand and the entire community demand is. Community monitor<br />

solution would be generic and available for use in future.<br />

Assessment<br />

Criteria<br />

Accelerates the development of a low<br />

carbon energy sector<br />

Score<br />

(1-5)<br />

4<br />

Overview of assessment, sources of evidence and comments<br />

Assessment:<br />

The project learning facilitates understanding of demand response which could facilitate connection of<br />

LCTs by deferring asset reinforcement.<br />

Evidence:<br />

WPD wanted to investigate whether engagement on a community level would be an alternative to<br />

conventional reinforcement and what was the most appropriate way to do this.<br />

The benefit of this project was to see if using demand side response can reduce the peak demand thus<br />

allowing deferral or removal of conventional reinforcement which could reduce demand driven<br />

reinforcement significantly. Additionally, due to communities being selected with preference of low carbon<br />

technologies indicative demand data for communities of the future was obtained.<br />

While the project determined that the cost of incentives and customer engagement significantly outweigh<br />

conventional reinforcement, there have been other learning benefits.<br />

References:<br />

• Community Energy Action; Closedown report; June 2015.<br />

PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING<br />

October 2016<br />

713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx<br />

288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!