09.12.2012 Views

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I FACTS AND PROCEDURE<br />

ORDER<br />

1 The applicant is a private company which provides youth care<br />

services and is registered in Norway, with its head office in<br />

Oslo. in 2008 the company provided care for more than 250<br />

children in Norway, employed 350 people, and had a turnover of<br />

approximately NOK 350 million. The applicant is a subsidiary of<br />

the Aleris Group, which has a turnover of approximately SEK 3<br />

billion, employs more than 5000 people and is headquartered in<br />

Stockholm, Sweden.<br />

2 On 20 June 2008, the Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth<br />

and Family Affairs published a contract notice for placements in<br />

child welfare institutions. According to the contract documents,<br />

the contract was to be awarded during a two stage negotiated<br />

procedure, the first of which would be a pre-qualification stage,<br />

in which the Directorate would select only those parties which<br />

satisfied the criteria set out in the contract notice. A key criterion<br />

in this respect was that only non-commercial private institutions<br />

would be permitted to go onto the second stage. Consequently,<br />

the applicant, which is a commercial service provider, was not<br />

able to compete for a contract.<br />

3 On 3 February 2009, the applicant lodged a complaint against<br />

Norway with the <strong>EFTA</strong> Surveillance Authority (hereinafter “ESA”),<br />

alleging that by permitting the exclusion of commercial operators<br />

from this award procedure, the Norwegian Directorate for<br />

Children, Youth and Family Affairs, Norway had failed to fulfil its<br />

obligations arising from Article 2 of Directive 2004/18/EC on<br />

the coordination of procedures for the award of public works<br />

contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts;<br />

and Articles 3, 31 and 36 of the Agreement on the European<br />

Economic Area (hereinafter “EEA”).<br />

4 in the complaint, the applicant submitted that the contracts<br />

covered the need for 170 to 300 places in child welfare<br />

institutions for four years (1 December 2008 to 30 November<br />

Case E-13/10 Aleris Ungplan AS v xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <strong>EFTA</strong> Surveillance Authority<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!