Report 2011 - EFTA Court

incompatible with the EEA Agreement, and that there was no need
for further measures.
16. By application registered at the EFTA Court on 2 September
2010, Konkurrenten requested the EFTA Court to annul the
contested decision.
IV THE CONTESTED DECISION
17. The contested decision describes the recipients of the aid as
follows:
AS Oslo Sporveier has since its establishment been active bus
transport, metro (“T-banen”), tram (“Trikk”) and ferry transport
[in Oslo]. […] As of 1934, Oslo Municipality became practically
the sole owner (with 98.8% ownership) until a reorganization
in July 2006. Following this reorganization, a new company,
Kollektivtransportproduksjon, which is wholly owned by Oslo
Municipality, became the 100% owner of AS Oslo Sporveier.
According to the Norwegian authorities Oslo Municipality was involved
in all issues of commercial importance relating to the carrying out
if collective bus transport by AS Oslo Sporveier, including financial
aspects of agreements/contracts with subsidiaries (such as AS
Sporveisbussene) or other third parties.
AS Oslo Sporveier operated an in-house department which carried
out most collective bus transport in Oslo. 2 On 23 April 1997 the bus
transport was separated from AS Oslo Sporveier and transferred to a
newly established company, AS Sporveisbussene.
Since 1994 AS Oslo Sporveier operated a tour bus division, The
division was transferred to AS Sporveisbussene when the company was
established in 1997. […]
2 The contested decision makes reference to three other operators which also held
concessions for carrying scheduled bus transport “on a few specific routes in Oslo”.
According to information contained in the letter by the Norwegian authorities of 16.
August 2007, approximately 65% of the market were covered by Sporveisbussene prior to
tendering the bus routes in Oslo (Annex A.8, p. 164–165).
CASE E-14/10 Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Surveillance Authority
Summary Report
CAse Case
e-14/10
e-xx/x
301