09.12.2012 Views

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JOINED CASES E-4/10, E-6/10 AND E-7/10<br />

Principality of Liechtenstein<br />

Reassur Aktiengesellschaft<br />

Swisscom RE Aktiengesellschaft<br />

Joined Cases E-4/10, E-6/10 and E-7/10 Principality of Liechtenstein, Reassur Aktiengesellschaft,<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 16<br />

Swisscom RE Aktiengesellschaft v <strong>EFTA</strong> Surveillance Authority<br />

v<br />

<strong>EFTA</strong> Surveillance Authority<br />

(Action for annulment of a decision of the <strong>EFTA</strong> Surveillance Authority – State<br />

aid – Special tax rules applicable to captive insurance companies – Notion of<br />

undertaking – Selectivity – Existing aid and new aid – Distortion of competition<br />

and effect on trade – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty –<br />

Obligation to state reasons)<br />

Judgment of the <strong>Court</strong>, 10 May <strong>2011</strong> .......................................................... 22<br />

<strong>Report</strong> for the Hearing................................................................................ 79<br />

1. Under EEA competition rules,<br />

the concept of an undertaking<br />

encompasses every entity engaged<br />

in economic activity, regardless<br />

of its legal status and the way in<br />

which it is financed. Any activity<br />

consisting in offering goods or<br />

services on a given market is an<br />

economic activity.<br />

2. in the case of State aid<br />

schemes, it is legitimate for ESA<br />

to confine itself to examining<br />

the general characteristics of a<br />

scheme without being required to<br />

examine each particular case in<br />

which it applies. For the purposes<br />

of applying Article 61(1) EEA<br />

to an aid scheme, it is sufficient<br />

Summary of the Judgment<br />

that the scheme benefits certain<br />

undertakings, a finding not called<br />

into question by the fact that it may<br />

also benefit entities which are not<br />

undertakings.<br />

3. The definition of aid is more<br />

general than that of a subsidy.<br />

The concept of aid not only<br />

includes positive benefits, such<br />

as subsidies themselves, but also<br />

measures which, in various forms,<br />

mitigate the charges which are<br />

normally included in the budget of<br />

an undertaking and which, thus,<br />

without being subsidies in the strict<br />

sense of the word, are similar in<br />

character and have the same effect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!