Report 2011 - EFTA Court

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Decision entered into force on 9 June 2007 and the time limit for EFTA States to adopt the measures necessary to implement the Act expired on the same date. 7 By letter of 6 July 2007 ESA invited the Government of Norway to provide information concerning the measures by which Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 had been made part of the internal legal order of Norway. 8 in its reply of 10 July 2007, the Norwegian Government informed ESA that as Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 deals with the organisation of budgetary commitments only, the Parliament’s approval of Joint Committee Decision No 81/2003, incorporating Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 into the EEA Agreement was considered a sufficient measure to incorporate the Act. 9 ESA did not agree with the arguments set forward by Norway and on 27 February 2008 issued a letter of formal notice. The Norwegian Government replied by letter of 8 October 2008, and reiterated its previous opinion that the Act had been incorporated by the Parliament’s approval of Joint Committee Decision No 81/2003. 10 On 1 July 2009 ESA delivered a reasoned opinion to Norway concluding that by failing to make Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 part of its internal legal order, Norway had failed to comply with its obligations under Article 7 EEA. 11 On the same day, the Authority issued a letter of formal notice for failure to make Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 part of its internal legal order. The Norwegian Government submitted a reply to both the letter and to the reasoned opinion of 1 July 2009 on 1 December 2009. 12 in those replies, Norway maintained that, due to their nature and content, it was not required to incorporate Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 and Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 into the Norwegian internal legal order. insofar as such an obligation should exist, Norway maintained that the acts had been incorporated into the Norwegian legal order in accordance with Article 7(a) EEA. CASE E-5/11 EFTA Surveillance Authority xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx v The Kingdom of Norway 422
13 Having assessed the reply, ESA upheld its opinion that the acts had not been made part of the Norwegian internal legal order as required by Article 7 EEA. Accordingly, ESA delivered a reasoned opinion to Norway on 24 February 2010 for failure to make Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 part of its internal legal order. 14 in its letter of 23 April 2010 in reply to the reasoned opinion, Norway informed ESA that after reassessing the case, both acts, Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006, would be incorporated by way of statutes and/ or regulations. The reply stated that Norway could not preclude the possibility that Regulation 1406/2002 indeed contained provisions affecting the rights and obligations of individuals. 15 By a letter of 24 August 2010, Norway informed ESA that work had been started to ensure the incorporation of both acts as soon as possible, and not later than 1 July 2011. 16 At a meeting in November 2010 ESA invited Norway to provide information on how far the incorporation process had come, and asked if Norway foresaw to finalise the incorporation before 1 July 2011 as indicated in earlier correspondence. The representatives of the Norwegian Government told ESA that four ministries in Norway were involved in the incorporation of the Regulation into the national legal order which made the task more time consuming. it had not yet been determined in Norway whether the incorporation into national law would require Parliamentary action, resolution or amendment to existing legislation. 17 in a letter of 1 December 2010 the Norwegian Government stated that the incorporation involved questions relating to the jurisdiction of several ministries. Accordingly the method of technical legal incorporation required further clarification between the ministries. in the letter it was further submitted that this work was in progress and more detailed information on the time schedule depended on the outcome of this process. However, it had been clarified that there was no need for changes to any laws and that the objective was to make the incorporation as soon as possible, and not later than 1 July 2011. CASE E-5/11 EFTA Surveillance Authority xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx v The Kingdom of Norway Summary Judgment CAse Case e-xx/x e-8/11 e-5/11 423
Page 1 and 2:
Summary Case e-xx/x RepoRt of the e
Page 3 and 4:
RepoRt of the eFtA Court 2011 www.e
Page 5 and 6:
The EFTA Court was set up under the
Page 7 and 8:
Foreword I DECISIONS OF THE COURT C
Page 9 and 10:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Summary C
Page 11 and 12:
I. Decisions of the Court xxxxxxxxx
Page 13 and 14:
CASE E-13/10 Aleris Ungplan AS v EF
Page 15 and 16:
ORDER OF THE COURT 31 January 2011
Page 17 and 18:
2010) with the possibility of exten
Page 19 and 20:
Any natural or legal person may, un
Page 21 and 22:
19 ESA argues that the special rule
Page 23 and 24:
Commission v Greece [2005] ECR I-47
Page 25 and 26:
Joined Cases e-4/10, e-6/10 and e-7
Page 27 and 28:
A measure by which the public autho
Page 29 and 30:
10. The determination whether a mea
Page 31 and 32:
for the reasoning to go into all th
Page 33 and 34:
THE COURT, composed of: Carl Bauden
Page 35 and 36:
II LEGAL BACkGROUND EEA law 5 Artic
Page 37 and 38:
(iii) aid which is deemed to have b
Page 39 and 40:
15 The coupon tax applies to compan
Page 41 and 42:
were requested to explain the tax t
Page 43 and 44:
ESA’s analysis, captive insurance
Page 45 and 46:
2. The amount of aid to be recovere
Page 47 and 48:
42 The reply from Reassur in Case E
Page 49 and 50:
activity, regardless of the legal s
Page 51 and 52:
the scheme at issue, without being
Page 53 and 54:
selective. Moreover, according to t
Page 55 and 56:
73 in this regard, it has to be exa
Page 57 and 58:
Arguments of the parties 81 The app
Page 59 and 60:
Cases Portugal v Commission, cited
Page 61 and 62:
Findings of the Court 94 With regar
Page 63 and 64:
103 Reassur and Swisscom submit tha
Page 65 and 66:
may have had tax concessions before
Page 67 and 68:
119 Accordingly, the question wheth
Page 69 and 70:
final decision. Reassur asserts tha
Page 71 and 72:
134 in ESA’s view, the publicatio
Page 73 and 74:
Findings of the Court 141 The aboli
Page 75 and 76:
it was already established at the t
Page 77 and 78:
154 ESA, with the support of the Co
Page 79 and 80:
163 in the case at hand, the situat
Page 81 and 82:
easoning followed by ESA in such a
Page 83 and 84:
Although these were not necessarily
Page 85 and 86:
The third part of the fourth plea:
Page 87 and 88:
have been aware by the date of publ
Page 89 and 90:
REPORT FOR THE HEARING in joined Ca
Page 91 and 92:
Tax Act. This decision was publishe
Page 93 and 94:
2010. The Reply from Reassur in Cas
Page 95 and 96:
21. Article 5 SCA reads as follows:
Page 97 and 98:
that the EFTA State concerned shall
Page 99 and 100:
28. Article 17 in Part ii of Protoc
Page 101 and 102:
73, points a) to f), of the Act, am
Page 103 and 104:
- Swisscom, represented by Dr Micha
Page 105 and 106:
that ESA’s findings in this regar
Page 107 and 108:
for certain undertakings in compari
Page 109 and 110:
the Groepsrentebox 19 and Hungarian
Page 111 and 112:
question were introduced in order t
Page 113 and 114:
provisions qualify as “existing
Page 115 and 116:
qualified as “existing aid” acc
Page 117 and 118:
much lower standard of protection o
Page 119 and 120:
they were enacted until publication
Page 121 and 122:
92. it is submitted that in cases w
Page 123 and 124:
effects. in the applicants’ view,
Page 125 and 126:
parties to whom it is of direct and
Page 127 and 128:
CASE E-12/10 EFTA Surveillance Auth
Page 129 and 130:
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 28 June 2011
Page 131 and 132:
to at point 30 of Annex Xviii to th
Page 133 and 134:
(6) Whereas the transnationalizatio
Page 135 and 136:
undertakings and to the undertaking
Page 137 and 138:
No. 19/1979, Respecting Workers’
Page 139 and 140:
information concerning the terms an
Page 141 and 142:
ESA, the entitlement provided for i
Page 143 and 144:
a “social security benefit”. Th
Page 145 and 146:
The Commission 38 The Commission su
Page 147 and 148:
44 The “minimum rates of pay, inc
Page 149 and 150:
insurance for their employees conce
Page 151 and 152:
Human Rights are important sources
Page 153 and 154:
REPORT FOR THE HEARING in Case E-12
Page 155 and 156:
II LEGAL BACkGROUND European law 6.
Page 157 and 158:
2. Everyone residing and moving leg
Page 159 and 160:
circumstances, and exceeds 12 month
Page 161 and 162:
7. Paragraphs 1 to 6 shall not prev
Page 163 and 164:
31. Article 3 of the Posting Act -
Page 165 and 166:
If the undertaking so requests, the
Page 167 and 168:
to register and provide information
Page 169 and 170:
the Posting Act constitute minimum
Page 171 and 172:
on grounds of illness for a period
Page 173 and 174:
encompass “minimum wages and othe
Page 175 and 176:
and accident” to be synonymous. A
Page 177 and 178:
73. According to ESA, it follows th
Page 179 and 180:
79. Furthermore, ESA submits that i
Page 181 and 182:
87. Further, it seems to ESA that i
Page 183 and 184:
Relevant law 92. iceland cites a co
Page 185 and 186:
minimum protection set out in Artic
Page 187 and 188:
Regulation No 1408/71 and Article 5
Page 189 and 190:
ight as concerns the preservation o
Page 191 and 192:
purposes of preserving their value
Page 193 and 194:
124. in addition, iceland also subm
Page 195 and 196:
sick leave is thus entitled to paid
Page 197 and 198:
Regulation No 1408/71 and Article 5
Page 199 and 200:
1408/71 for the protection of worke
Page 201 and 202:
150. The Kingdom of Norway argues,
Page 203 and 204:
155. The Kingdom of Norway acknowle
Page 205 and 206:
deemed to fall within the scope of
Page 207 and 208:
169. The Commission further submits
Page 209 and 210:
Directive 96/71 and Article 7 of th
Page 211 and 212:
Case e-18/10 EFTA Surveillance Auth
Page 213 and 214:
end of the period prescribed in the
Page 215 and 216:
having decided to dispense with the
Page 217 and 218:
men and women in occupational socia
Page 219 and 220:
18 in its reply of 11 March 2010, t
Page 221 and 222:
Court. Article 33 SCA corresponds i
Page 223 and 224:
VI COSTS 33 Under Article 66(2) of
Page 225 and 226:
Case e-4/11 Arnulf Clauder Case xxx
Page 227 and 228:
RECHTSSACHE E-4/11 Arnulf Clauder (
Page 229 and 230:
a, b oder c erfüllt, d. h. dass de
Page 231 and 232:
URTEIL DES GERICHTSHOFS 26. Juli 20
Page 233 and 234:
- der Regierung des Königreichs de
Page 235 and 236:
3 Für eine ausführliche Darstellu
Page 237 and 238:
2. „Familienangehöriger“ a) de
Page 239 and 240:
das Recht, sich dort auf Dauer aufz
Page 241 and 242:
13 im Jahr 2009 wurde die Ehe zwisc
Page 243 and 244:
18 in seinem Antrag auf vorabentsch
Page 245 and 246:
Familiennachzug selbst dann geltend
Page 247 and 248:
Daueraufenthaltsrecht nicht mehr an
Page 249 and 250:
2004/38 für EWR-Staatsangehörige
Page 251 and 252:
den Artikeln 6 und 7 der Richtlinie
Page 253 and 254:
Familienangehörige selbst die Bedi
Page 255 and 256:
35 Der Gerichtshof stellt weiterhin
Page 257 and 258:
sondern abgeleitete Rechte, die sie
Page 259 and 260:
43 Nach dem Dafürhalten des Gerich
Page 261 and 262:
46 Könnte ein EWR-Staatsangehörig
Page 263 and 264:
ist. Nach ständiger Rechtsprechung
Page 265 and 266:
Aus diesen Gründen erstellt DER GE
Page 267 and 268:
SITZUNGSBERICHT in der Rechtssache
Page 269 and 270:
II RECHTLICHER HINTERGRUND Europare
Page 271 and 272:
6. Artikel 7 der Richtlinie - Recht
Page 273 and 274:
8. Artikel 24 der Richtlinie - Glei
Page 275 and 276:
11. Die Liechtenstein betreffenden
Page 277 and 278:
anderen Mitgliedstaats zu verbleibe
Page 279 and 280:
3) Die Kontrollfrist zur Überprüf
Page 281 and 282:
16. Die in Artikel 41 Absatz 1 Buch
Page 283 and 284:
19. im Jahr 2002, nach mehrfacher v
Page 285 and 286:
24. Am 26. April 2010 erhob Herr Cl
Page 287 and 288:
- die Regierung des Fürstentums Li
Page 289 and 290:
lücke darstellt, sondern dass das
Page 291 and 292:
von EWR-Staaten erfüllen müssen,
Page 293 and 294:
ermittelt wird - die Kriterien, die
Page 295 and 296:
38. Mit Blick auf den Erwerb eines
Page 297 and 298:
invalidenversicherung 11 (ELG) abh
Page 299 and 300:
Zur dritten Frage 42. Die Regierung
Page 301 and 302:
Existenzmittel zur Bedingung zu mac
Page 303 and 304:
tigten EU-Bürger nachziehen möcht
Page 305 and 306:
Staat laut völkerrecht, vorbehaltl
Page 307 and 308:
fünf Jahre lang ununterbrochen im
Page 309 and 310:
56. Die EFTA-Überwachungsbehörde
Page 311 and 312:
58. Die EFTA-Überwachungsbehörde
Page 313 and 314:
60. Angesichts dieser Erwägungen v
Page 315 and 316:
die EFTA-Überwachungsbehörde, das
Page 317 and 318:
Arbeitnehmer oder Selbstständiger
Page 319 and 320:
enthaltsberechtigten das Recht auf
Page 321 and 322:
Familie nach einem fünfjährigen A
Page 323 and 324:
mission erinnert daran, dass nach s
Page 325 and 326:
Case e-14/10 Konkurrenten.no AS v E
Page 327 and 328:
to the provisions of national law p
Page 329 and 330:
- the European Commission (“the C
Page 331 and 332:
constitute an aid, and subsequently
Page 333 and 334:
III PRE-LITIGATION PROCEDURE 12 By
Page 335 and 336:
In order to compensate for the oper
Page 337 and 338:
that no changes had been made to th
Page 339 and 340:
of scheduled bus transport services
Page 341 and 342:
34 With regard to the first and sec
Page 343 and 344:
for the measure and thus enable the
Page 345 and 346:
Sporveier to operate scheduled bus
Page 347 and 348:
59 As ESA neither explained its fin
Page 349 and 350:
maintains that the aid must be seen
Page 351 and 352:
allocating costs nor that the accou
Page 353 and 354:
Findings of the Court 84 As a preli
Page 355 and 356:
92 it follows from all of the foreg
Page 357 and 358:
3. The application is based on thre
Page 359 and 360:
[…] 7. Article 16 of the Agreemen
Page 361 and 362:
incompatible with the EEA Agreement
Page 363 and 364:
In order to compensate for the oper
Page 365 and 366:
SCA. 6 it answered that question in
Page 367 and 368:
V FORMS OF ORDER SOUGHT By THE PART
Page 369 and 370:
in April 2010, and that the contest
Page 371 and 372:
States to prolong aid in principle
Page 373 and 374:
44. in the rejoinder, the defendant
Page 375 and 376:
which had an effect on Oslo Sporvei
Page 377 and 378:
decision to make the capital inject
Page 379 and 380:
statements of the Norwegian authori
Page 381 and 382:
the aid. 43 Concerning the argument
Page 383 and 384:
of alteration which affects the ent
Page 385 and 386:
submits that in order to determine
Page 387 and 388:
contends that the capital injection
Page 389 and 390:
Case e-16/10 Philip Morris Norway A
Page 391 and 392:
SAK E-16/10 Philip Morris Norway AS
Page 393 and 394:
importerte tobakksprodukter har en
Page 395 and 396:
EFTA-DOMSTOLENS DOM 12. september 2
Page 397 and 398:
- Philip Morris Norway AS (”saks
Page 399 and 400:
slik I FAkTA OG PROSEDyRE DOM 1 ved
Page 401 and 402:
forbudet mot synlig oppstilling av
Page 403 and 404:
Bestemmelsene i artikkel 11 og 12 s
Page 405 and 406:
Det kan på utsalgssteder gis nøyt
Page 407 and 408:
Innlegg inngitt til EFTA-domstolen
Page 409 and 410:
frie varebytte etter EØS-avtalen a
Page 411 and 412:
ha en direkte effekt på bruken av
Page 413 and 414:
Denne sak faller derfor utenfor omr
Page 415 and 416:
dens oppfatning ikke er relevant fo
Page 417 and 418:
skape presedens for å tillate EØS
Page 419 and 420:
ikke får anvendelse på nasjonal l
Page 421 and 422:
hvorvidt forbudet mot synlig oppsti
Page 423 and 424:
2005 s. 1, avsnitt 45, og den retts
Page 425 and 426:
44 Bestemmelser som gjelder salgsor
Page 427 and 428:
importeres til Norge. Disse produkt
Page 429 and 430:
en slik virkning ikke klart kan fas
Page 431 and 432:
54 Saksøker anfører at en forhold
Page 433 and 434:
57 Saksøkte gjør gjeldende at om
Page 435 and 436:
forholdsmessighetsperspektiv bare d
Page 437 and 438:
av alternativene saksøker viser ti
Page 439 and 440:
aktuelle restriktive tiltak. Selv o
Page 441 and 442:
anta, alt tatt i betraktning, at fo
Page 443 and 444:
så omfattende at saksøkte må bev
Page 445 and 446:
74 Kommisjonen anfører at EU-domst
Page 447 and 448:
Rep. 2007 s. 86, avsnitt 43). EFTA-
Page 449 and 450:
i størst mulig grad reduserer en f
Page 451 and 452:
det vises til der, og sak C-434/04
Page 453 and 454:
På dette grunnlag avgir EFTA-DOMST
Page 455 and 456:
RETTSMØTERAPPORT i sak E-16/10 ANM
Page 457 and 458:
for markedsføring i alle typer med
Page 459 and 460:
III SPØRSMåL 7. Følgende spørsm
Page 461 and 462:
mot tobakksskader 9. mars 1973 nr.
Page 463 and 464:
Med røykeutstyr forstås i denne l
Page 465 and 466:
Saksøker - Europakommisjonen, repr
Page 467 and 468:
16. Uten hensyn til viktigheten av
Page 469 and 470:
ter utgjør en hindring av det frie
Page 471 and 472:
Oppstillingsforbudet og spesialiser
Page 473 and 474:
eller iii) hindrer adgang for impor
Page 475 and 476:
28. Saksøker foreslår følgende s
Page 477 and 478:
32. i tillegg understreker saksøke
Page 479 and 480:
staterer saksøker at partene er ue
Page 481 and 482:
at det finnes noe årsakssammenheng
Page 483 and 484:
tobakksmerker. Disse konsekvenser o
Page 485 and 486:
Mindre inngripende tiltak for å re
Page 487 and 488:
det finske parlament med at et slik
Page 489 and 490:
Saksøkte vurdert alle bevisene i s
Page 491 and 492:
edusere bruken av tobakk. Disse til
Page 493 and 494:
forbyr forbud mot synlig oppstillin
Page 495 and 496:
ør forstås som en oppfordring til
Page 497 and 498:
er kjent med at det har pågått ar
Page 499 and 500:
Det første spørsmål 65. Saksøkt
Page 501 and 502:
enhver omstendighet må anvendelsen
Page 503 and 504:
70. Saksøkte anfører at i mange s
Page 505 and 506:
markedsadgangen for produkter fra a
Page 507 and 508:
og innenlandske produkter. Saksøkt
Page 509 and 510:
at saksøkers syn er basert på en
Page 511 and 512:
80. Saksøkte viser til fast rettsp
Page 513 and 514:
hvordan et oppstillingsforbud kan v
Page 515 and 516:
som skal behandles, hvorvidt angjel
Page 517 and 518:
å nå det aktuelle mål. 66 i till
Page 519 and 520: tiltak er et ledd i en konsistent,
Page 521 and 522: 97. Saksøkte understreker to forho
Page 523 and 524: ikke finnes; de alternative tiltak
Page 525 and 526: 103. Saksøkte anmoder EFTA-domstol
Page 527 and 528: tilsvarende virkning som en kvantit
Page 529 and 530: som produkter hvis forbruk er knytt
Page 531 and 532: 114. ifølge Finlands regjering er
Page 533 and 534: øyking. Derfor kan det ikke være
Page 535 and 536: enkeltes rett til å utøve det yrk
Page 537 and 538: er forskjellsbehandling. 86 Kombine
Page 539 and 540: underbygges med dokumentasjon på e
Page 541 and 542: Spørsmål 1: En lovgivning som fas
Page 543 and 544: Storbritannia Det første spørsmå
Page 545 and 546: mellom tobakksmarkedet og alkoholma
Page 547 and 548: skjønnsmargin, og at EFTA-domstole
Page 549 and 550: Storbritannia bemerker at EU-domsto
Page 551 and 552: synlig oppstilling av tobakksproduk
Page 553 and 554: fant at salgsordninger ikke skal be
Page 555 and 556: meget lite antall, anfører ESA at
Page 557 and 558: andre EØS-stater. 111 Til det tred
Page 559 and 560: 156. Når det gjelder hvorvidt mind
Page 561 and 562: 159. ifølge rettspraksis kan imidl
Page 563 and 564: 162. Kommisjonen gjør gjeldende at
Page 565 and 566: Case e-5/11 EFTA Surveillance Autho
Page 567 and 568: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 20 September
Page 569: Decision entered into force on 1 Ja
Page 573 and 574: 24 it is further argued that in the
Page 575 and 576: On those grounds, hereby: THE COURT
Page 577 and 578: Case e-3/11 Pálmi Sigmarsson v The
Page 579 and 580: MáL E-3/11 Pálmi Sigmarsson gegn
Page 581 and 582: hvort þær uppfylli þær kröfur
Page 583 and 584: DÓMUR DÓMSTÓLSINS 14. desember 2
Page 585 and 586: - Eftirlitsstofnun EFTA (ESA), í f
Page 587 and 588: 2 Í 2. og 4. mgr. 43. gr. EES-samn
Page 589 and 590: sameiginlegu EES-nefndinni og eftir
Page 591 and 592: að mati Seðlabankans alvarlegum o
Page 593 and 594: II MáLAVEXTIR OG MEðFERð MáLSIN
Page 595 and 596: III SPURNINGIN Lögsaga Athugasemdi
Page 597 and 598: fylgt málsmeðferðinni sem mælt
Page 599 and 600: Álit dómstólsins 24 Dómstóllin
Page 601 and 602: 29 Í öðru lagi bendir efni og up
Page 603 and 604: takmarkanir á frjálsu flæði fj
Page 605 and 606: nein hlutlæg viðmið í reglum hi
Page 607 and 608: framkvæmd EES-samningsins. Þau te
Page 609 and 610: skilyrði teljist uppfyllt og til h
Page 611 and 612: fjárhæðin í hans tilviki sé ti
Page 613 and 614: legum þáttum. EFTA-ríki njóta
Page 615 and 616: sem bönnuðu innflutning aflandskr
Page 617 and 618: IV MáLSkOSTNAðUR 57 Ríkisstjórn
Page 619 and 620: SkÝRSLA FRAMSöGUMANNS í máli E-
Page 621 and 622:
4. Í 2. og 4. mgr. 43. gr. EES-sam
Page 623 and 624:
verið veittar upplýsingar. Þegar
Page 625 and 626:
eglur um gjaldeyrismál nr. 1082/20
Page 627 and 628:
III MáLAVEXTIR OG MEðFERð MáLSI
Page 629 and 630:
Stefnandi - Stefnda, Seðlabanka Í
Page 631 and 632:
áðstafanir ekki brjóta í bága
Page 633 and 634:
Seðlabankinn verði að líta til
Page 635 and 636:
Stefndi 30. Stefndi gerir þá alme
Page 637 and 638:
við verndarráðstafanirnar. Enn f
Page 639 and 640:
aðgerðanna falli utan lögsögu E
Page 641 and 642:
41. Að teknu tilliti til hins mikl
Page 643 and 644:
um gjaldeyrismál - sé í samræmi
Page 645 and 646:
4. mgr. 43. gr. EES-samningsins sé
Page 647 and 648:
við 2. gr. bókunar 2 við samning
Page 649 and 650:
hæpið að halda því fram að a
Page 651 and 652:
tilvist slíks undanþágukerfis fr
Page 653 and 654:
CASE E-8/11 EFTA Surveillance Autho
Page 655 and 656:
THE COURT, composed of: Carl Bauden
Page 657 and 658:
… have more than 60 000 train pas
Page 659 and 660:
2.2. A characterisation of their su
Page 661 and 662:
15 in its reply to the reasoned opi
Page 663 and 664:
Articles 7(1) and 7(2) of the Direc
Page 665 and 666:
Court notes that it is apparent fro
Page 667 and 668:
On those grounds, hereby: THE COURT
Page 669 and 670:
Case e-1/11 Dr A xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Page 671 and 672:
SAk E-1/11 Dr. A (Fri bevegelighet
Page 673 and 674:
forholdsmessige, for eksempel med h
Page 675 and 676:
EFTA-DOMSTOLENS DOM 15. desember 20
Page 677 and 678:
- Europakommisjonen (“Kommisjonen
Page 679 and 680:
faglig veiledning og tilsyn av over
Page 681 and 682:
7 Den 23. februar 2009 søkte klage
Page 683 and 684:
anerkjennelse av yrkeskvalifikasjon
Page 685 and 686:
14 Direktivets artikkel 2 lyder: Om
Page 687 and 688:
… 24 og 25,….og skal med hensyn
Page 689 and 690:
formelle kvalifikasjoner avgitt fra
Page 691 and 692:
d) ikke er uegnet for yrket … (3)
Page 693 and 694:
norsk autorisasjon, lisens eller sp
Page 695 and 696:
30 Det henvises til rettsmøterappo
Page 697 and 698:
Liiton Kustannus Oy Restamark, EFTA
Page 699 and 700:
22. desember 2010, ennå ikke i Sml
Page 701 and 702:
44 ifølge opplysningene gitt av de
Page 703 and 704:
direkte på grunnlag av direktivet.
Page 705 and 706:
for en diskvalifisering kunne være
Page 707 and 708:
direktivet omhandler er harmonisert
Page 709 and 710:
språket. Etter ESAs oppfatning fø
Page 711 and 712:
yrkeskvalifikasjoner er gitt i henh
Page 713 and 714:
65 Direktivet bygger på en forutse
Page 715 and 716:
krever relevant språkkunnskap i de
Page 717 and 718:
medisinske fagfolk og eventuelt til
Page 719 and 720:
78 Når det gjelder grunnlaget i au
Page 721 and 722:
På dette grunnlag avgir EFTA-DOMST
Page 723 and 724:
RETTSMØTERAPPORT i sak E-1/11 ANMO
Page 725 and 726:
5. i vedtak av 12. august 2009 avsl
Page 727 and 728:
IV RETTSLIG BAkGRUNN EØS-rett 8. E
Page 729 and 730:
2. For dette direktivs formål er y
Page 731 and 732:
mindre enn varigheten fastsatt i ne
Page 733 and 734:
15. Direktivets artikkel 53 lyder:
Page 735 and 736:
V SkRIFTLIGE INNLEGG 20. i medhold
Page 737 and 738:
anerkjennes, om nødvendig ved å g
Page 739 and 740:
“akseptabel praksis” at godkjen
Page 741 and 742:
anerkjent i Norge. 4 Derimot kan hu
Page 743 and 744:
yrkeskvalifikasjoner, kun underlagt
Page 745 and 746:
denne hovedforutsetning undergraves
Page 747 and 748:
lir denne konklusjon bekreftet ikke
Page 749 and 750:
individene på bakgrunn av direktiv
Page 751 and 752:
43. Den spanske regjering viser ogs
Page 753 and 754:
utilstrekkelighet, bør vedkommende
Page 755 and 756:
artikkel 23 har rett til godkjennin
Page 757 and 758:
autorisasjon og ikke til godkjennin
Page 759 and 760:
53. Når det gjelder den tredje bet
Page 761 and 762:
direktivet enhver EØS-stat som reg
Page 763 and 764:
opplæringskurser som er relevante
Page 765 and 766:
nr. 6 må alle EØS-stater godkjenn
Page 767 and 768:
67. videre bemerker ESA at direktiv
Page 769 and 770:
70. For så vidt gjelder den situas
Page 771 and 772:
(som definert i artikkel 24) og bå
Page 773 and 774:
seg til å kontrollere at diplomet
Page 775 and 776:
78. Under enhver omstendighet vil d
Page 777 and 778:
vertsstatens nasjonale myndigheter,
Page 779 and 780:
Europakommisjonen 83. Kommisjonen p
Page 781 and 782:
85. Kommisjonen konstaterer at dire
Page 783 and 784:
virkning fra 1. juli 2009 (dvs. for
Page 785 and 786:
spesialistleger) som er oppført i
Page 787 and 788:
Kommisjonen at godkjenning av medis
Page 789 and 790:
1. I en situasjon hvor en søker op
Page 791 and 792:
II. Administration and Activities o
Page 793 and 794:
Agreement states that the Governmen
Page 795 and 796:
III. Judges and staff xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Page 797 and 798:
In addition to the Judges, the foll
Page 799 and 800:
Per CHRISTIANSEN Born in 1949 in La
Page 801 and 802:
Skúli MAGNÚSSON Born: 14 October
Page 803 and 804:
List of Court Decisions published i
Page 805 and 806:
Case Parties Type of Case 9 E-1/95
Page 807 and 808:
Page 809 and 810:
Page 811 and 812:
Page 813 and 814:
Page 815 and 816:
Page 817 and 818:
Case Parties Type of Case 90 Joined
Page 819 and 820:
Page 821 and 822:
Case Parties Type of Case 116 E-16/
Page 823 and 824:
The EFTA Court was set up under the
show all

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?