09.12.2012 Views

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

Report 2011 - EFTA Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

103. The Defendant proposes that the <strong>Court</strong> should answer the second<br />

question as follows:<br />

Assuming that the national court concludes that the display ban falls<br />

under the scope of Article 11 EEA, it is justified on grounds of public<br />

health unless it is apparent that, in the circumstances of law and of<br />

fact which characterise the situation in the EEA Contracting Party<br />

concerned, the protection of public health against the harmful effects<br />

of tobacco use can be secured equally effectively by measures having<br />

less effect on intra-EEA trade.<br />

The Finnish Government<br />

104. The Finnish Government points out that a visual display ban was<br />

adopted by the Finnish Parliament in 2010 and will take effect in<br />

2012. The main goal of the Finnish legislation is to strengthen<br />

existing statutory provisions enacted in 1976 for the purposes of<br />

reducing smoking and related health detriments and to provide<br />

for more efficient measures to reduce the opportunities for<br />

children and young people to start smoking.<br />

105. The Finnish Government observes that prohibition of the<br />

visible display of tobacco products constitutes one of the most<br />

important elements of the new legislation. Although advertising<br />

of tobacco products and other sales promotion activities have<br />

been banned for over three decades, the new prohibition is<br />

necessary because the visible display of tobacco products has<br />

become a significant method of marketing. in addition, the way<br />

in which products are displayed is of particular concern. These<br />

products are, as a rule, placed at the cash desk of retail stores<br />

where products intended for children and adolescents are stored.<br />

Placing products attractive to these groups alongside tobacco<br />

products brings such tobacco products to their attention and<br />

increases the risk that they will start smoking.<br />

The first question<br />

106. in the Finnish Government’s view, a general prohibition on the<br />

visible display of tobacco products cannot be considered a<br />

CASE E-16/10 Philip Morris Norway xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AS v The Norwegian State 464 397

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!