20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The whole affair put a strain on the marriage which had not been there before.<br />

Even before the declaration was made on 9 April there had been a further pin-prick to<br />

Philip’s self-esteem. The consort’s throne used by his mother-in-law as Queen Consort at<br />

the annual state opening of Parliament was taken out of the House of Lords and sent for<br />

storage at the country house of Lord Cholmondeley, the Lord Great Chamberlain,<br />

because it was (mistakenly) believed that only a female consort could occupy a throne<br />

and share the sovereign’s canopy on that occasion. A male consort would only be<br />

allowed a ‘chair of state’ on a lower level. Philip could be forgiven for thinking that the<br />

fanatical attachment of Government and Palace to what they believed to be correct<br />

protocol was aimed at diminishing himself. He was particularly prickly with the Old<br />

Guard of Elizabeth’s Palace household, headed by the to him stuffed-shirt figure of<br />

Tommy Lascelles, whom Elizabeth had inherited from her father as Private Secretary,<br />

and the charming but utterly conventional Joey Legh, Master of the Household, both of<br />

whom tended to look upon him as an interloper. Philip, said one of his staff, ‘got very<br />

fed up with purple corridors and people telling him what he couldn’t do’. It didn’t help<br />

that, while the Queen’s secretariat moved smoothly in to the offices which were already<br />

there, his own rooms had not been made ready. There was a noticeable gulf between the<br />

two offices. ‘Tommy Lascelles was terrifying, he used to stare at you,’ a young lady clerk<br />

who worked for Philip recalled. ‘None of the women in the private secretaries’ office<br />

were under forty-five, the young ones in Prince Philip’s were regarded as if they were<br />

the Folies Bergère…’ Things improved a year later when Lascelles retired and was<br />

succeeded by Michael Adeane, who worked well with Edward Ford and Martin<br />

Charteris, but, as they recall, Philip still believed in giving the private secretaries a hard<br />

time.<br />

As a sop and in deference to his organizational ability, Elizabeth appointed him to<br />

chair the Coronation Commission. Discussions about the date of the ceremony had begun<br />

even before the King’s funeral. A day in 1952 was ruled out for various reasons – the<br />

restoration of the Abbey would not be complete in time, but more importantly, as<br />

Churchill wrote to Robert Menzies, the Prime Minister of Australia, the seriousness of the<br />

economic situation made it ‘vital that not a single working day should be unnecessarily<br />

lost in this year of crisis’, or, as he put it more succinctly to Lascelles, ‘Can’t have<br />

Coronations with the bailiffs in the house.’ 18 The Government at first favoured May<br />

1953, but on mature consideration the Home Secretary advised the Cabinet that the<br />

choice to be offered Elizabeth should be narrowed down to between 29 May and 2 June<br />

in order to avoid a clash with Derby Day on 3 June, a sacred day in the horse-racing<br />

calendar. The Cabinet advised that on the whole Tuesday, 2 June, was the most suitable<br />

date. Elizabeth, already a fanatical devotee of the turf, quite understood; Tuesday was<br />

to be the day. Lascelles wrote to Colville on 10 April conveying the Queen’s approval of<br />

2 June. Colville then wrote to the Duke of Norfolk, who, as Earl Marshal, would be<br />

responsible for all the Coronation arrangements, a half-humorous letter which<br />

nevertheless showed the overwhelming importance attached to racing by the English<br />

establishment (Churchill himself was a keen racehorse owner). Tuesday, 2 June, he told

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!