20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

un on the pound had developed. Britain’s gold and dollar reserves fell by 15 per cent<br />

that month, and the Americans, when appealed to for help, bluntly told the British that<br />

none would be forthcoming without a ceasefire. Isolated in Cabinet and in Parliament,<br />

Eden accepted the principle of a UN-brokered ceasefire. The Suez operation had become<br />

a fiasco. Even those in favour of it were disgusted by this apparently abject surrender<br />

with no objective achieved (beyond the destruction of the Egyptian air force). ‘By<br />

stopping when they did,’ Eden’s biographer wrote, ‘the British incurred the maximum of<br />

odium and the minimum of advantage.’<br />

Eden was finished, physically and politically. He had been suffering since October<br />

from recurrent fevers, the legacy of the bungled bile duct operation. On 19 November<br />

his doctors advised a complete rest, preferably in a warm climate. Ian and Ann Fleming<br />

offered the Edens their Jamaica house, Goldeneye; on 23 November the exhausted Prime<br />

Minister and his wife flew out there to general astonishment and dismay. He returned in<br />

December to a notably cool reception from his party and the country. It was a sad end<br />

for a great career in Parliament and at the Foreign Office. On 20 December Eden, who<br />

had always dominated the House of Commons, was forced on the defensive over the<br />

issue of collusion with Israel over Suez and lied: ‘there were no plans to get together to<br />

attack Egypt… there was no foreknowledge that Israel would attack Egypt’. His final<br />

defiant declaration, ‘I would be compelled… if I had the same very disagreeable<br />

decisions to take again, to repeat them’, offended everybody, both those who had<br />

supported the Suez operation but had disliked the bungling and the forced retreat and<br />

those who had opposed it. They were his last words in the House of Commons, where<br />

the mood was described not so much as hostile but, more fatally, as dismissive. Early in<br />

January his doctors told him that if he continued in office he was unlikely to survive; he<br />

decided to resign – in his wife’s words, ‘he wanted to stay alive’. On 8 January he drove<br />

down to Sandringham with his wife to see Elizabeth; they dined and spent the night<br />

there. Elizabeth expressed her personal sadness and offered him an earldom; it was<br />

agreed that he would come to Buckingham Palace the next day formally to hand over his<br />

seals of office and at 6 p.m. on 9 January he did so.<br />

Eden’s conversations with the Queen on 8 January at Sandringham have remained<br />

secret although he made a memorandum of them at the time and subsequently wrote<br />

two others. He was always extremely sensitive on the question of whether or not<br />

Elizabeth approved of the Suez operation. When Robert Lacey published an article in the<br />

Sunday Times implying that the Queen had been strongly opposed to the Suez operation<br />

but had been unable to prevent it, Lord Avon (as Eden had by then become) in January<br />

1976 was ‘dealing somewhat angrily with Martin Charteris’ over it, and told Lacey in<br />

April 1976 that the Queen ‘understood what we were doing very well’. He was most<br />

emphatic that she did not disapprove of the operation, although he was honest enough<br />

to admit that ‘nor would I claim that she was pro-Suez’, according to his biographer. He<br />

remembered her as being absolutely constitutional and impartial and, as Lacey<br />

conceded, it would have been quite improper for him to discuss or disclose any more<br />

than that. Lacey’s subsequent biography of the Queen recounted the suspicion of ‘at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!