20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

free a spirit to put up with the restrictions of royal life. Tony could never properly<br />

belong to the royal family, his bohemian temperament would never allow it, and<br />

Margaret, try as she might to adapt to Tony’s way of life, could never be anything but a<br />

part of the royal family. It was the only world she knew.<br />

The wedding of Princess Margaret and Antony Armstrong-Jones was held at<br />

Westminster Abbey on 6 May 1960 – staged might have been a better word. It was the<br />

first great royal spectacular since the Coronation, designed at least in part by the<br />

bridegroom himself. Norman Hartnell, whose speciality was the heavily embroidered<br />

grand occasion gown such as he had produced for the Coronation and the Queen’s own<br />

wedding, was under strict instructions from Armstrong-Jones to keep it simple. The<br />

dress was spectacularly plain, depending for effect on simplicity of line and the subtle<br />

deployment of thirty yards of white silk organza. A silk tulle veil ordered from Paris by<br />

Hartnell fell in clouds from the magnificent Poltimore tiara, bought for the Princess at<br />

auction for £5,000, skilfully placed on her dark hair swept up into a chignon. Margaret<br />

looked the part of a fairy-tale princess as she was driven to the Abbey in a glass coach,<br />

the focus of television cameras sending her image around the world. The sniping of the<br />

press at the bridegroom’s unconventional circle of friends, at his ex-girlfriend Jacqui<br />

Chan’s choice of that moment to cut a pop record and at the last-minute embarrassment<br />

of the withdrawal of his best man, Jeremy Fry, ostensibly because of jaundice but<br />

actually due to rumours circulating about an alleged homosexual incident in his past,<br />

was eclipsed by the glamour of the occasion. The wedding cost £26,000 and questions<br />

had been raised in Parliament over the use of Britannia with its crew of twenty officers<br />

and 237 ratings for the six-week honeymoon, when the weekly cost of running the yacht<br />

was underwritten by the taxpayer to the extent of some £10,000 a week. The Queen<br />

Mother defused this by announcing that she would pay for it out of her own purse.<br />

However, the Macmillan Government, eager to cash in on the ‘feel-good factor’,<br />

contributed without a qualm. Suez, the criticisms of Altrincham, Osborne and<br />

Muggeridge, faded into the past as the public indulged in one of its periodic orgies of<br />

mass participation in and identification with royal family occasions. The occasion was<br />

splendidly stage-managed by the Lord Chamberlain, and interpreted by the Great Royal<br />

Communicator, Richard Dimbleby, without whose voice no royal occasion would have<br />

seemed complete. Dimbleby had recently been diagnosed as having cancer (he died five<br />

years later), but his choice of phrase to project the image which the public saw on<br />

camera and the reverential tone of voice confirming the ritual nature of the occasion<br />

were, as always, perfect:<br />

For one moment we see the bride now as she looks about her at the Abbey in this lovely gown of white silk<br />

organza, with the glittering diadem on her head, the orchids in her hand, and the comforting, tall, friendly,<br />

alert figure of the Duke of Edinburgh on whose right arm she can rely…<br />

The sun shone, the bride was beautiful; only the gender roles of the old fairy-tale had<br />

been reversed. The bridegroom played the Cinderella part, symbolically connecting the<br />

traditional royal family with the new talented generation which was to dominate the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!