20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Airways. Relations between Palace and press (who behaved with admirable restraint<br />

with regard to Prince William during his adolescent years) took a sharp turn for the<br />

worse when a tabloid reporter, posing as a rich sheikh in need of public-relations<br />

advice, entrapped Sophie Rhys-Jones, now the Countess of Wessex, into unguarded<br />

remarks about the royal family and leading politicians. The result was an unedifying<br />

spat between the Palace and the Press Complaints Commission, and the episode fuelled<br />

public discussion – centring on the Wessexes’ roles as television producer and publicrelations<br />

executive – of the extent to which members of the royal family might use their<br />

position for commercial advantage. The row deepened in the autumn of 2001 when<br />

Edward’s television production company, Ardent, was accused of breaching the rules<br />

covering Prince William’s arrival for his first term at St Andrews University by<br />

continuing to film after all the other media, conforming to the agreement, had left.<br />

Ardent’s action was universally condemned, not least by the Prince of Wales.<br />

There has been a noticeable dilution in recent years of the upper-class element in the<br />

household, an acknowledgement of the need for change in the wake of the turmoil<br />

created by the ‘People’s Princess’. Elizabeth herself, when speaking in public, has lost a<br />

good deal of her cut-glass accent, and people even claim to detect a strain of ‘estuary<br />

English’, as spoken in the popular television soaps. There has been an upgrading of the<br />

status of women; for the first time the Press Secretary is a woman, Penelope Russell-<br />

Smith, although the first woman Deputy Private Secretary, Mary Francis, has returned to<br />

the business world and the positions occupied by other women are relatively minor.<br />

Women in their traditional role, gracious, well-dressed, charming, are acceptable as<br />

ladies-in-waiting or, on a lower level, as secretaries – ‘lady clerks’ – dressers,<br />

housekeepers and chambermaids (chefs are always male). The senior women in the<br />

royal family – Elizabeth, the Queen Mother and Margaret – are as much responsible for<br />

this attitude as are the senior male members of the household. While the senior royal<br />

ladies show good judgement in the women they choose to be ladies-in-waiting and have<br />

an excellent rapport with them (Margaret, the most demanding, difficult and capricious<br />

of the royal women, has the most intelligent ladies-in-waiting), they all of them prefer<br />

men as companions and conversationalists and in a professional capacity. The Queen<br />

Mother, who was young in the 1920s and 1930s, probably the most bitchy and<br />

competitive era as far as society women were concerned, tends to the traditional view<br />

that all beautiful women are stupid and intelligent women ugly, although she admitted<br />

the biographer Elizabeth Longford as the one exception.<br />

Although there are no black faces in evidence within the Palace walls, no one could<br />

accuse Elizabeth of being racist. The Commonwealth Secretariat is set up just down the<br />

Mall from Buckingham Palace in Marlborough House and its head, the Secretary-<br />

General, has the right of direct access to the Queen as head of the Commonwealth. To<br />

anyone who attends Commonwealth occasions, such as the annual Commonwealth Day<br />

reception, it is obvious how happy Elizabeth is in that ambience and how much she is<br />

genuinely loved and appreciated there. Many Commonwealth people have been<br />

surprised and offended by the recent sustained British attacks on the monarchy. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!