20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Others included members of the royal family who were ‘fed up with opening hospital<br />

wards only to have them closed and then receive hundreds of letters as a result’. Shea,<br />

they thought, must have believed himself to be expressing a widespread opinion within<br />

the Palace; much of Freeman’s article appeared to be conjecture, but ‘the nub of the<br />

story – about the Commonwealth – was true’. The Queen loyally stood by her Press<br />

Secretary. At Holyrood House just after the story broke, Shea sat between Elizabeth and<br />

Mrs Thatcher, both of whom told him to pay no attention to the media rumpus, but none<br />

the less his position in relation to Downing Street had become difficult. Accompanying<br />

Elizabeth on the state visit to China, during which Philip made a widely publicized<br />

remark about ‘slitty eyes’, Shea became involved in a televised scuffle with Chinese<br />

security guards. He decided that he had had enough and six months later left to join<br />

Hanson plc.<br />

Eighteen months previously in 1984–5, Thatcher had taken on the British coalminers<br />

in a prolonged battle which ended in defeat for the National Union of Mineworkers. It<br />

had been a period of anguish for Britain, with horrendous violence between the pickets<br />

and the police, tales of families’ divided loyalties, of thuggery and poverty. At the very<br />

end of the strike Elizabeth and Philip visited The Times on the occasion of the<br />

newspaper’s bicentenary. While Prince Philip, in his customary forthright way, is<br />

alleged to have denounced the miners’ leader, Arthur Scargill, as ‘a shit’, Elizabeth was<br />

introduced to the paper’s labour editor, Paul Routledge, as the man covering the miners’<br />

strike. She volunteered that she had been down a coal mine in Scotland that had closed<br />

soon afterwards and, after a pause, added, ‘It’s all about one man, isn’t it?’ Routledge<br />

replied that perhaps it wasn’t about one man and that, knowing the miners and having<br />

been brought up among them, he didn’t think one man could bring out 100,000 men on<br />

strike for a whole year. ‘There was a pregnant pause,’ Routledge recalled, and the party<br />

moved on. Eight years later, having written an unauthorized biography of Scargill, he<br />

had become more familiar with the megalomaniac tendencies of the man. ‘With the<br />

hindsight that has come from writing this book,’ he admitted, ‘I now feel that I owe the<br />

Queen an apology. By that stage, at any rate, the strike was about one man. Scargill<br />

may not have started the strike, but one word, one signal from him could have called it<br />

off before the struggle plumbed the depths of misery, violence and failure to which it<br />

sank… The Queen was right.’ 18<br />

Elizabeth, therefore, did not blame Thatcher for the miners’ strike. No one has ever<br />

discovered what her feelings were when Mrs Thatcher took the salute of the returned<br />

Falklands veterans in the parade through the City of London in October 1982. She may<br />

have reflected that the Falklands victory was very much Mrs Thatcher’s, but other<br />

people thought it odd to see the Prime Minister standing on the dais instead of the<br />

Queen who is head of the armed forces. Not one member of the royal family was invited<br />

to be present at this ceremonial occasion, in contrast to the 1945 parade celebrating the<br />

end of the Second World War, when the King took the salute with Churchill and Attlee at<br />

a discreet distance. Mrs Thatcher did not, however, attend the fortieth anniversary<br />

celebrations of D-Day in 1984 because she considered it very much the Queen’s occasion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!