20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was far from overjoyed by the prospect of the marriage and would have preferred a less<br />

exotic bride. She was persuaded into it by Mountbatten, the royal matchmaker, who felt<br />

paternal towards Michael and was charmed by Marie-Christine – ‘the worst piece of<br />

advice Mountbatten ever gave the Queen,’ according to several senior courtiers.<br />

Realistically, Elizabeth had little room to act; rejection of a bride for a minor member of<br />

the family on the grounds that she was divorced and of the wrong religion would<br />

understandably have led to a good deal of criticism, and so, after approval by the Privy<br />

Council, she gave her formal agreement. The wedding took place abroad (as the Royal<br />

Marriages Act of 1772 specifically prevents members of the royal family being married<br />

in civil ceremonies in England) in June 1978 in Vienna, the birthplace of the bride’s<br />

mother, a Hungarian countess. At the last moment the Pope, who had granted an<br />

annulment of Marie-Christine’s first marriage, refused a dispensation for a church<br />

wedding, almost certainly because the children of the marriage were to be brought up as<br />

Protestants in order to preserve their position in the line of succession to the throne<br />

(which Michael, then sixteenth, would have to renounce because of his marriage to a<br />

Catholic).<br />

‘Even if her behaviour had been exemplary, I do not believe that Princess Michael<br />

would ever have established a cosy relationship with the Queen,’ Mountbatten’s<br />

secretary, who also later worked for Prince and Princess Michael, wrote. ‘The royal<br />

family is very inward-looking and finds it hard to welcome strangers; and the Queen,<br />

particularly, finds it very difficult to relax unless she is surrounded by those with whom<br />

she feels at home.’ Elizabeth did not feel at home with Marie-Christine. Despite her<br />

looks, chic and the powerful charm she could exert, the glamour which she brought to<br />

the royal family was not appreciated nor regarded as a plus in public relations terms.<br />

The inner circle royal family saw her as an adventuress and her behaviour seemed to<br />

confirm their suspicions. Not content with life on the outer fringes of the family, the<br />

new Princess Michael was determined to push herself in. She made it known that she<br />

expected to be invited to join the family for Christmas. Elizabeth gave in, but was<br />

surprised to find her unwanted guest complaining about the rooms allotted to her<br />

children and their nanny. She did not care for the public complaints about not being<br />

allotted money on the Civil List or of poverty when she gave Prince and Princess<br />

Michael the house in Kensington Palace formerly occupied by the Snowdons (as a result<br />

of which there were constant complaints about and quarrels with the PSA, the Public<br />

Services Agency, which was then responsible for the royal palaces, over decoration) and<br />

Marie-Christine then spent almost half a million pounds on doing up the Gloucestershire<br />

manor house, Nether Lypiatt, which they subsequently acquired. Charles, who<br />

particularly disliked her, tried to prevent their moving into the same county as his new<br />

country home, Highgrove, but failed and at Kensington Palace both he and Margaret<br />

made it clear that they did not like their neighbour, whom the family referred to as<br />

‘Princess Pushy’, ‘the Valkyrie’ and ‘You Know Who’. After a spate of bad publicity<br />

involving wigs and Texan millionaires, Princess Michael kept a lower profile, but was<br />

left in no doubt that the family had frozen her out. Queen Elizabeth, an expert at the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!