20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

gesture of defiance against his father, the late King’s birthday as the date of his<br />

marriage. Not one member of the Duke of Windsor’s family and only seven English<br />

friends attended the wedding of the man who only six months earlier had been the<br />

idolized King-Emperor. The King had forbidden his brothers to go to the wedding and<br />

Lord Louis Mountbatten, once the bridegroom’s great friend, had thought it politic to<br />

decline.<br />

The King and his brother were by now barely on speaking terms, the relationship<br />

having gone downhill with astonishing rapidity since the night of their emotional<br />

farewell in December. George VI had subsequently discovered that the Duke had lied to<br />

him over the amount of money at his disposal and that he had something like £1 million<br />

salted away as savings on his income from the Duchy of Cornwall, money which by<br />

rights should have gone with the Crown. The King’s temper was not improved on<br />

finding that part of the interest on this sum which should have been his had been made<br />

over to Wallis. A bitter family quarrel ensued. The King had promised as part of the<br />

Abdication arrangement that the Duke should be paid an allowance of £25,000 on the<br />

Civil List, but after the revelation of the huge proportions of the Duke’s nest-egg, both<br />

Churchill and Neville Chamberlain, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, usually on<br />

opposing sides, advised the King to pay the sum himself in order to avoid a<br />

parliamentary discussion of the subject. ‘The moment this [the Duke’s £1 million<br />

savings] is disclosed,’ Churchill wrote to Chamberlain, ‘the Labour Party could hardly<br />

help drawing the moral of the very large savings which it is possible for Royal persons<br />

to make, and to argue that the existing Civil List should be reduced.’ Chamberlain, for<br />

once, agreed, thus avoiding, as he told his sister Ida, ‘a discussion which would<br />

thoroughly discredit the Duke himself but would not fail to give another jolt to the<br />

Monarchy’. The King, therefore, reluctantly agreed to pay the allowance out of his<br />

private purse. He had also to buy out the Duke’s interests in Balmoral and Sandringham,<br />

which, being family as opposed to Crown property, Edward had inherited as eldest son.<br />

After much wrangling the total valuation of the properties was settled at £289,853; this,<br />

invested in War Loan, produced £10,144 per annum which was paid to foreign residents<br />

tax free. The King would top this up with a further £11,000 a year, an allowance which<br />

would cease on his death.<br />

Windsor supporters charged him with treating his brother meanly, but it is significant<br />

that when the King’s official biographer, Sir John Wheeler-Bennett, saw the papers<br />

concerning the affair, he told the diarist Robert Bruce Lockhart ‘how, as Duke of<br />

Windsor, Edward was inveterately greedy of money and made great demands on his<br />

brother, King George VI – demands which the King fulfilled at considerable sacrifice to<br />

himself… how insistent the Duke was on his demands and how little gratitude he<br />

showed when his extravagance was paid for by the King’. Wheeler-Bennett’s book was<br />

published in 1958, but none of this information appeared in it. Elizabeth II, with the<br />

reputation of the royal family to consider, no doubt preferred it to remain out of the<br />

public domain. In August 1949 Churchill told Lord Beaverbrook that the Duke of<br />

Windsor had a tax-free ‘income of £100,000 a year from England [something like £4–5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!