20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Elizabeth’s pregnancy was still a secret when she arrived in Canada towards the end<br />

of June for a mammoth six-week 15,000-mile tour in the course of which as Queen of<br />

Canada she officiated at the opening of the St Lawrence Seaway in the presence of the<br />

Canadian Premier, John Diefenbaker, and his wife and President Eisenhower<br />

accompanied by his wife, Mamie. She also visited Chicago on Britannia for what Time<br />

described as ‘the most lavish 14 hours in Chicago’s history’, and the warmest reception<br />

she and Philip had so far enjoyed on their North American tour. She had had to take two<br />

days off resting at Whitehorse in the Yukon, ostensibly with stomach trouble, but<br />

otherwise, as Time put it, her long, sometimes too arduous tour had been more of a<br />

personal success than a triumph of monarchy in highly independent, increasingly<br />

nationalistic Canada. As the Whitehorse Star informed her, ‘QUEEN, YOU ARE OK BY<br />

US.’ Elizabeth flew back by Comet to reveal what only the courtiers and heads of the<br />

relevant states already knew – her pregnancy. The family were reunited at Balmoral for<br />

the annual holiday, joined briefly by the Eisenhowers – the President, his wife, their son<br />

John and grandchildren – who spent the night and enjoyed the inevitable picnic tea at<br />

Loch Muick.<br />

Elizabeth and Philip were delighted with her pregnancy. At Balmoral observers<br />

recalled ‘how happy the prospective mother and father were – teasing each other. The<br />

Queen was saying how extraordinary it was after so long. They were frightfully pleased<br />

and happy with each other – after all they had had their ups and downs.’ They had been<br />

trying for a baby for two or three years since Philip returned from the four-month<br />

Britannia cruise to the Lisbon reconciliation. Earlier that year he had once again been on<br />

a long sea voyage on Britannia circling the globe, visiting India and Pakistan, then<br />

crossing the Pacific from 20 January to 30 April. The new baby was the product of their<br />

reunion. (Years later ‘insiders’, ignoring the dates, spread rumours that Prince Andrew<br />

was Porchester’s child, conceived while Prince Philip was away.) The birth of Andrew at<br />

Buckingham Palace on 19 February 1960 was widely seen as setting the seal on a<br />

successful marriage, reinforced by the revelations in a Sunday tabloid of a former<br />

superintendent at Windsor, now publican of a Hertfordshire pub, the Plough and Dial,<br />

about the royal couple’s sleeping arrangements (together in a huge 7ft 6in Victorian bed<br />

with a tightly packed horsehair mattress), which earned the man an injunction. Asked<br />

the reason for the almost ten-year gap between the birth of Princess Anne and her<br />

younger brother, friends gave various explanations – from ‘she was too busy when she<br />

first became Queen – then she got broody over having more babies’, to ‘Prince Philip<br />

thought two was enough’. The baby was named Andrew after his paternal grandfather<br />

in a further gesture towards Philip.<br />

Eleven days before the baby was born Elizabeth had made another public gesture<br />

intended to repair some of the hurt caused by the 1952 decision not to allow Philip’s<br />

family name to be passed on to their children. Queen Mary was dead, Churchill in<br />

retirement; the Queen Mother’s reservations about the name change probably remained<br />

the same, but Elizabeth now offered a compromise. On 8 February 1960 she issued a<br />

statement in Council:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!