20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14<br />

Daylight upon Magic<br />

‘You’re killing the monarchy you know, with this film you’re making. The whole institution depends on<br />

mystique and the tribal chief in his hut. If any member of the tribe ever sees inside the hut, then the whole<br />

system of the tribal chiefdom is damaged and the tribe eventually disintegrates.’<br />

David Attenborough, anthropologist and maker of wildlife films, to Richard Cawston, producer-director of<br />

Royal Family<br />

Elizabeth’s deepest instinct was for privacy and for the preservation of her family life as<br />

far as possible from the public gaze. She had, like her father, been trained in the<br />

principles of Walter Bagehot, who had warned of the fragility of the monarchy’s<br />

mystique: ‘We must not let in the daylight upon magic.’ Her advisers, however, were<br />

concerned that in the context of the 1960s, the monarchy was seen as boring and<br />

outdated. The answer, it seemed to them, was to bring the monarchy closer to the public<br />

by allowing them to peer through the keyhole by means of television cameras. First they<br />

were invited into the palaces to view the royal collections in a joint BBC/ITV<br />

collaboration, Royal Palaces. With Royal Family, in 1969, the public were permitted not<br />

only to look into the palaces, but also over Elizabeth’s shoulder on private as well as<br />

public occasions.<br />

The Mountbatten family persuaded Elizabeth to overcome her reservations about the<br />

idea. Mountbatten himself was always an eager publicist (two years earlier Independent<br />

Television had made a film about him, The Life and Times of Lord Mountbatten), while his<br />

son-in-law, Lord Brabourne, was a successful film producer (although not he but Lord<br />

Windlesham was to be the producer on this film). Philip was, as always, in favour of<br />

new ideas and change as far as the monarchy was concerned. A new element had been<br />

introduced at the Palace with the arrival in 1965 of a young Australian, William<br />

Heseltine, as Assistant Press Secretary and the retirement in 1968 of the stonewalling<br />

Commander Colville, whom he then replaced. Heseltine, unlike the Commander, saw his<br />

job as giving the press easier access to the royal family and the film was timed to<br />

coincide with Charles’s highly stage-managed investiture at Caernarvon. The film<br />

commentary promoted it as a revolutionary step in allowing the royal family to be seen<br />

as human beings, speaking and acting normally where before they had always appeared<br />

as icons behaving, and above all speaking, in a formal ‘royal’ way. The idea of<br />

presenting the royals as ‘normal’ and ‘ordinary’, ignoring the extraordinary<br />

circumstances under which they have to operate, was to prove a dangerous step,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!