20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and perhaps to avoid the repeated conjecture that she was upstaging the monarch. The<br />

newspapers accused Mrs Thatcher of ambulance-chasing and elbowing the royal family<br />

out of the limelight by dashing to be the first on the scene of disasters like the sinking of<br />

the ferry Herald of Free Enterprise at Zeebrugge or the destruction of the Pan-Am airliner<br />

over Lockerbie. IRA outrages found the Prime Minister swiftly comforting victims (she<br />

had, after all, nearly become a terrorist statistic herself in the Brighton hotel bombing).<br />

‘She wanted to demonstrate solidarity with the people who suffered and to show that<br />

terrorists would never break British determination,’ an aide said. None the less,<br />

Downing Street was conscious of the impression that was being given and sensitive<br />

about it; there seems to have been a breakdown in communication between Prime<br />

Minister and Palace as to who should go where and when. ‘The royal family couldn’t be<br />

relied on to go,’ a Thatcher aide said defensively and indeed there was widespread<br />

resentment when Elizabeth did not go to the Lockerbie disaster area but sent Prince<br />

Andrew instead.<br />

Mrs Thatcher is sparing in her references to the Queen in her memoirs of her Downing<br />

Street years. The most she would say about her audiences with the Queen was:<br />

Anyone who imagines that they are a mere formality or confined to social niceties is quite wrong; they are<br />

quietly businesslike and Her Majesty brings to bear a formidable grasp of current issues and breadth of<br />

experience. And although the press could not resist the temptation to suggest disputes between the Palace<br />

and Downing Street, especially on Commonwealth affairs, I always found the Queen’s attitude towards the<br />

work of the government absolutely correct. 19<br />

Suggestions that Mrs Thatcher might be interviewed on the subject were met by the<br />

Palace response, ‘I doubt if she’d say anything, she’s too loyal.’<br />

The impression persists among politicians and Commonwealth members that<br />

Elizabeth did act as a restraining influence on Mrs Thatcher in some of her more<br />

intransigently tactless moods. There is speculation that it was advice from the Palace<br />

which widened the celebration of the Downing Street anniversary from a dinner to<br />

which Mrs Thatcher and her Cabinet invited Elizabeth, an occasion with strictly party<br />

overtones, to one to which all party leaders and descendants of former Prime Ministers<br />

were invited. Another occasion was the Cenotaph ceremony held on Armistice Sunday in<br />

Whitehall, at which the Queen and the leaders of the political parties lay wreaths. Mrs<br />

Thatcher originally refused to allow the newly formed SDP to take part. A leading<br />

member let the feelings of his party at being thus excluded be known – indirectly – to<br />

the Palace. Mrs Thatcher gave way. Mrs Thatcher, however, could be obdurate on<br />

certain issues. Elizabeth would have liked to have visited the European Parliament in<br />

Strasbourg; her Prime Minister resolutely opposed the idea of giving royal countenance<br />

to that despised institution. Elizabeth did not go.<br />

Mrs Thatcher’s major innovation in British politics has been the fearless determination<br />

with which she set about attacking the sacred cows and ancient institutions of Britain.<br />

Doctors, lawyers, the universities, the trades unions, the nationalized industries, the BBC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!