20.02.2017 Views

38656356325923

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

epresenting the Queen, and Charles Doughty of Withers & Co., representing the<br />

Duchess of York, at which Bryan was present. According to Ronald Ferguson, Bryan was<br />

holding out for a house for Sarah in England, plus £5,000 a week income for herself for<br />

life. However, although under English law Sarah was entitled to half the marital home,<br />

Sunninghill belonged to Elizabeth, while Andrew himself was not a rich man. He had his<br />

naval pay and his Civil List income, which, being provided by the taxpayer for the<br />

performance of his royal duties, could hardly be used to support his ex-wife, and in any<br />

case was soon to be abolished. Sarah, however, had her daughters, Beatrice and<br />

Eugenie, to whom Elizabeth was devoted and whom Sarah had been heard to describe as<br />

‘my security’ – and her silence. For Elizabeth it was an exercise in damage limitation.<br />

(‘Those girls [by which he meant Sarah and Diana]’, a courtier was to opine two years<br />

later, ‘are going to cost the Queen a fortune.’)<br />

The first public breach between the Duchess and the Palace came as a result of further<br />

manipulation of the media when the Daily Mail leaked the fact that the Duchess of York<br />

had consulted lawyers about a separation from her husband. On 19 March Charles<br />

Anson, the Queen’s Press Secretary, summoned six court correspondents, including the<br />

BBC’s Paul Reynolds, and issued a statement announcing the Yorks’ separation and told<br />

them to come to his office if they wanted further guidance. Reynolds accepted the<br />

invitation and, after five minutes’ conversation with Anson, broadcast on the BBC’s<br />

World at One to the effect that, ‘The knives are out for Fergie at the Palace.’ According<br />

to Reynolds, Anson told him that the rift between the Yorks had begun the previous year<br />

and that the Duchess was being advised by Sir Tim Bell’s firm. The Daily Mail leak was<br />

followed up by a story in the Sunday Telegraph, one of the few newspapers actively<br />

supporting the royal family, that Sir Robert Fellowes was thought to have confided that<br />

the Duchess was not in control of herself, that both the Queen and the Queen Mother<br />

had tried to ‘calm her’ but the entire family now thought it was ‘time to wash their<br />

hands of her’. Both Fergusons were paranoid about their cousin Robert at the Palace but,<br />

while they demanded and got a public apology from Anson, the York camp felt that<br />

whatever the Palace might have said in its subsequent statement, the leak to the Mail<br />

had come from Diana, who was close to its editor-in-chief, Sir David English, and<br />

subsequently became even closer to its royal correspondent, Richard Kay. Anson did not,<br />

as was widely reported, offer his resignation to Elizabeth, but he did apologize to the<br />

Queen and the Duchess of York for the embarrassment caused. The episode was a<br />

disagreeable foretaste of what was to come as the monarchy was to become embroiled<br />

in the Waleses’ marital troubles.<br />

Diana, idolized by the public, had been increasingly calling the shots in the media war<br />

between herself and her husband. Charles found himself cast not only as an uncaring<br />

husband (which was the truth), but as a bad father (which was not). Incidents such as<br />

Prince William’s accident in June the previous year – when he was hit on the head by a<br />

golf club – were highlighted in the press as evidence of Charles’s selfishness. While<br />

Diana kept vigil at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children as their son<br />

underwent a minor operation and spent the night there, Charles attended the opera

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!