14.12.2012 Views

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER FOUR<br />

ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND INTEGRITY BY<br />

RESOURCE TYPE<br />

ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES, 1895-PRESENT<br />

THE MCKIM, MEAD & WHITE PORTFOLIO 1249<br />

While McKim, Mead & White became popular and prolific designers in many avenues <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> architectural realm, <strong>the</strong> following discussion will focus on its residential work, especially<br />

those residences that were erected in suburban and rural areas.<br />

Between 1879 and 1912 <strong>the</strong> firm received over three hundred residential commissions for<br />

single family houses and to a far lesser extent for small apartments and attached dwellings,<br />

representing just under 40 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir total client list for that period. Approximately<br />

one hundred <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> residential designs survive. 1250<br />

McKim, Mead & White's residential practice was an integral part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir work; house<br />

commissions defined <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice and its partners - personally, artistically, and financially - at every<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir careers. 1251<br />

Samuel White classifies three basic career phases represented in McKim, Mead &<br />

White's residential designs, labeling <strong>the</strong>m as "early, transitional, and mature." 1252 Leland Roth<br />

divides <strong>the</strong> career <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firm into five categories, reflecting all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir work - not only<br />

residential - and <strong>the</strong>se perhaps describe a more accurate evolution to maturity. Roth's first two,<br />

"Fledglings 1870-1879" and "New Firm 1879-1886," relate to <strong>the</strong> firm's early phase, with <strong>the</strong><br />

latter overlapping <strong>the</strong> transitional era; <strong>the</strong> middle one, "Renaissance 1886-1892," relates to <strong>the</strong><br />

transitional phase; and "Ensembles 1893-1899" and "Pinnacle 1900-1909" relate to <strong>the</strong> most<br />

mature phase while all original partners remained alive. 1253 The more simple nomenclature<br />

clearly describes <strong>the</strong> firm's artistic and integrated intellectual progress, but this classification is<br />

somewhat elementary, applicable to almost any architectural firm that had a sustained career.<br />

1249<br />

The emphasis here is on <strong>the</strong> same decade Hyde <strong>Park</strong> was constructed. A more detailed discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> firm's Beaux-Arts work immediately follows this section.<br />

1250<br />

Samuel White, The Houses <strong>of</strong> McKim, Mead & White (New York: Rizzoli in association with <strong>the</strong><br />

Museums at Stony Brook, 1998), 11.<br />

1251<br />

White, 12.<br />

1252<br />

White, 12.<br />

1253<br />

Roth, McKim, Mead & White, Architects. Roth's first chapter, entitled "Foundations 1840-1870," also<br />

covers <strong>the</strong> earliest development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three individual partners, but before <strong>the</strong>y united into one firm.<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!