14.12.2012 Views

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Historical Significance and Integrity by Resource Type<br />

Although this era saw a trend to more classical motifs, <strong>the</strong> firm experimented freely,<br />

combining styles, fusing styles, borrowing from o<strong>the</strong>r sources, and reinterpreting elements to fit<br />

its need. This variety can be found in examples from this period, such as Berkeley House, <strong>the</strong><br />

LeRoy King house, in Newport (1884-86); 1274 Naumkeag, <strong>the</strong> Joseph Hodges Choate in<br />

Stockbridge, Massachusetts (1885-86); 1275 <strong>the</strong> James Hampden Robb House in Southampton,<br />

Long Island (1885); 1276 Beacon Rock, <strong>the</strong> Edward Dennison Morgan III house, also in Newport<br />

(1888-91); 1277 <strong>the</strong> Samuel Longstreth Parrish House, also in Southampton (1889); 1278 and <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r E.D. Morgan house, in Wheatley Hills, Long Island (1890-91 and 1898-1900). 1279<br />

These examples show that <strong>the</strong> firm successfully designed many country houses<br />

using a wide variety <strong>of</strong> sources, and no two houses were <strong>the</strong> same. However, Wilson feels<br />

that <strong>the</strong> designs for <strong>the</strong> smaller houses "all followed a formula," usually with a center entry<br />

and through hall, while <strong>the</strong> larger, more complex designs - and more expensive ones -<br />

merited more individual attention from <strong>the</strong> partners. 1280 As <strong>the</strong> practice grew, this was most<br />

likely <strong>the</strong> case.<br />

These commissions marked <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> a concentration on suburban design and a shift in<br />

focus to "<strong>the</strong> urban center." 1281 They, along with <strong>the</strong> experiments in Italian Renaissance<br />

commercial structures and Georgian/Federal Revival townhouses being built in <strong>the</strong> cities, were<br />

<strong>the</strong> prelude to <strong>the</strong> most mature, most classical, and most academic period <strong>of</strong> McKim, Mead &<br />

White's work. The increased reliance on classical prototypes for new designs was based<br />

partially on <strong>the</strong> belief that <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical order <strong>of</strong> classical proportions brought order to <strong>the</strong><br />

built environment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fast-growing city. In addition, America's structures should reflect <strong>the</strong><br />

glory <strong>of</strong> bygone empires, if <strong>the</strong> country was to project a similar image. 1282 The firm's portfolio<br />

was giving:<br />

great impetus to <strong>the</strong> claim that America was no longer a follower but a leader in creating a<br />

great civilization . . . As with many American architects from <strong>the</strong> turn-<strong>of</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-century period,<br />

two goals and accomplishments can be discerned in <strong>the</strong> firm's work: a search for an<br />

architectural order, and a search for an appropriate image for Americans. 1283<br />

This was a gradual process that eventually led to <strong>the</strong> "notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'American<br />

Renaissance.'" 1284 Leland Roth credits <strong>the</strong> firm <strong>of</strong> McKim, Mead & White as unique in that it<br />

looked both to <strong>the</strong> past for classical direction and into <strong>the</strong> future for learning how to best<br />

express America's prosperous rise in political, economic and social arenas through architectural<br />

designs. 1285 The firm, in following this path, contributed to <strong>the</strong> American Renaissance. 1286<br />

1274 White, 103-04.<br />

1275 White, 108-16.<br />

1276 White, 132-37.<br />

1277 White, 138-39.<br />

1278 White, 144-49; MacKay, 284.<br />

1279 MacKay, 278, 284.<br />

1280 MacKay, 277.<br />

1281 Roth, 2.<br />

1282 Roth, 180.<br />

1283 MacKay, 277.<br />

1284 MacKay, from Wilson et al, American Renaissance; and Richard Guy Wilson, "Architecture and <strong>the</strong><br />

Reinterpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Past in <strong>the</strong> American Renaissance," Winterthur Portfolio 18 (Spring 1983), 69-87.<br />

1285 Roth, 2.<br />

229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!