World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PROOF COPY<br />
products facing finite natural resources such as land, water and genetic potential. Scarcity of<br />
<strong>the</strong>se resources would be compounded by competing demands for <strong>the</strong>m originating in<br />
urbanization, industrial uses and use in bio-fuel production, by forces that would change <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
availability such as climate change and <strong>the</strong> need to preserve resources for future generations<br />
through environmentally responsible and sustainable use.<br />
Figure 4.3 Arable land per cap (ha in use per person)<br />
0.700<br />
0.600<br />
0.500<br />
0.400<br />
0.300<br />
0.200<br />
0.100<br />
developing countries<br />
developed countries<br />
world<br />
Naturally, one could interpret <strong>the</strong> declining arable land per person in parallel with <strong>the</strong><br />
observed increasing average food consumption per person as a sign of ever increasing<br />
agricultural productivity (crop yields). In practice, changes in arable land (in use) per person<br />
will be <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong>se countervailing forces (population / demand growth and increasing<br />
crop yields) with <strong>the</strong> exact outcome differing among countries. This section will address a few<br />
of <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned issues by unfolding <strong>the</strong> resource use implications of <strong>the</strong> crop<br />
production projections presented in <strong>the</strong> preceding chapter but, as shown in Figure 4.4, an<br />
advance conclusion could be that <strong>the</strong> average area of arable land in use per person is expected<br />
to stabilize <strong>towards</strong> <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> projection period.<br />
The perception that <strong>the</strong>re is no more, or very little, new land to bring under cultivation<br />
might be well grounded in <strong>the</strong> specific situations of land-scarce countries and regions such as<br />
South Asia and <strong>the</strong> Near East/North Africa but may not apply, or may apply with much less<br />
force, to o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> world. As discussed above, <strong>the</strong>re are still as yet unused large tracts<br />
of land with varying degrees of agricultural potential in several countries, most of <strong>the</strong>m in<br />
sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America with some in East Asia. However, as noted, this land<br />
may lack infrastructure, be partly under forest cover or in wetlands which should be protected<br />
for environmental reasons, or <strong>the</strong> people who would exploit it for <strong>agriculture</strong> lack access to<br />
appropriate technological packages or <strong>the</strong> economic incentives to adopt <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
In reality, expansion of land in agricultural use continues to take place. It does so<br />
mainly in countries which combine growing needs for food and employment with limited<br />
access to technology packages that could increase intensification of cultivation on land<br />
already in agricultural use. It also has been expanding in countries with abundant land<br />
0.462<br />
0.242<br />
0.186<br />
0.440<br />
0.218<br />
0.166<br />
0.422<br />
0.197<br />
0.150<br />
0.000<br />
1960 1980 2000 2020 2040<br />
0.405<br />
0.181<br />
0.139<br />
112