World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PROOF COPY<br />
Such optimism notwithstanding, achieving significant declines in <strong>the</strong> numbers<br />
undernourished may prove to be a more arduous task than commonly thought. A combination<br />
of higher national average food consumption and reduced inequality 26 can have a significant<br />
impact on <strong>the</strong> proportion of <strong>the</strong> population undernourished. However, when population<br />
growth is added, such gains do not necessarily translate into commensurate declines in <strong>the</strong><br />
absolute numbers. In this context, it is noted that WFS halving target, being set in absolute<br />
terms (numbers undernourished), is much more difficult to reach than <strong>the</strong> MDG1 target which<br />
is set in terms of halving <strong>the</strong> proportion undernourished, not <strong>the</strong> absolute numbers.<br />
Monitoring progress <strong>towards</strong> <strong>the</strong> WFS halving target will always show countries with high<br />
population growth rates as making less progress than countries with low population growth<br />
rates, even when both make <strong>the</strong> same progress <strong>towards</strong> <strong>the</strong> MDG1 target. Finally, an<br />
additional factor why progress may be slow is <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> share of adults in total<br />
population. This raises <strong>the</strong> average MDERs of <strong>the</strong> countries and, ceteris paribus, contributes<br />
to making <strong>the</strong> incidence of undernourishment higher that it would o<strong>the</strong>rwise be.<br />
In conclusion, in many countries <strong>the</strong> decline in <strong>the</strong> numbers undernourished will be<br />
slow. Where population growth rates are high <strong>the</strong> numbers undernourished may increase by<br />
2015. This prospect notwithstanding, <strong>the</strong> significant improvements implied by <strong>the</strong> projections<br />
should not be underestimated: <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> developing country population living in<br />
countries with relatively low incidence of undernourishment (under 5 percent) would increase<br />
from <strong>the</strong> present 645 million (13 percent of <strong>the</strong> total of <strong>the</strong> developing countries) to 3330<br />
million (49 percent) in <strong>2030</strong>; and <strong>the</strong> part living in countries with high incidence (over 20<br />
percent) would fall drastically from 40 percent to 4 percent. The shift of China from <strong>the</strong> 5-10<br />
percent class to <strong>the</strong> one of under 5 percent, and of India from <strong>the</strong> over 20 percent to <strong>the</strong> 10-20<br />
percent class are instrumental in <strong>the</strong>se prospective developments. More details are given in<br />
Figure 2.9<br />
26 Food consumption per capita, being a bounded variable (a rich person can eat/waste so much food and a poor<br />
person must consume a minimum amount in order to survive), does not offer as much scope for increase in<br />
inequality as income. The indices of inequality of access to food are generally well below those of income. For<br />
example, for 100 countries with Gini coefficient data from surveys for both income and food (admittedly of<br />
different years and qualities) <strong>the</strong> simple Gini average of <strong>the</strong> income is 0.39 and that of food 0.14 (data in<br />
http://www.fao.org/economic/ess/food-security-statistics/en/). For <strong>the</strong>se reasons, <strong>the</strong> increase in national<br />
averages of food consumption beyond certain levels is bound to be accompanied by declines in inequality. We<br />
take this prospect on board by assuming that countries (with significantly higher projected kcal/person/day) will<br />
have lower food inequality in <strong>the</strong> future. How much lower depends on <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>the</strong>y make in raising <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
average kcal/person/day, as follows: Future CV=Present CV times (Present kcal/Future kcal), subject to future<br />
CV=> 0.20.<br />
42