World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision - Fao
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PROOF COPY<br />
for both food and non-food uses, but with <strong>the</strong> latter including only moderate increases in <strong>the</strong><br />
use of crops as feedstocks for producing biofuels. This conclusion reflects mainly <strong>the</strong> prospect<br />
that global demand will grow at much lower rates than in <strong>the</strong> past, for <strong>the</strong> following reasons.<br />
• First, population growth will be lower than in <strong>the</strong> past, and population will peak and<br />
decline in several major countries and regions such as Japan, Europe, China and Brazil.<br />
• Second, more countries and population groups will be gradually attaining levels of per<br />
capita food consumption beyond which <strong>the</strong>re is little scope for major fur<strong>the</strong>r increases.<br />
Structural changes in diets, at <strong>the</strong> same time, will continue to determine shifts from<br />
staples to livestock products and fruit and vegetables.<br />
• Third, while <strong>the</strong>se factors will impact <strong>the</strong> bulk of world demand and make it grow at<br />
rates lower than in <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong>re are several countries which will need to increase food<br />
consumption faster than in <strong>the</strong> past: <strong>the</strong>y are those that start with low levels of food<br />
consumption per capita and many of <strong>the</strong>m will continue to have high population growth<br />
rates. However, such potential may not be expressed fully as effective demand in all of<br />
<strong>the</strong>m because <strong>the</strong>y may still have low incomes and significant poverty for a long time to<br />
come. 45 of <strong>the</strong> 98 developing countries we project individually have presently incomes<br />
per capita of less than $1,000; 15 of <strong>the</strong>m may still have incomes under $1,000 in <strong>2050</strong><br />
according to <strong>the</strong> economic growth projections used here. There are 65 countries with<br />
food/capita under 2700 kcal/person/day and a population of 2.8 billion: 16 of <strong>the</strong>m, with<br />
a population of 800 million, may still have less than 2700 kcal/person/day in <strong>2050</strong>.<br />
These developments imply that world production would need to increase at rates much<br />
lower than in <strong>the</strong> past, e.g. total agricultural output by 1.1 percent p.a. from 2005/07 to <strong>2050</strong>,<br />
down from 2.2 percent p.a. in <strong>the</strong> preceding equal period, and cereals by 0.9 percent p.a. vs.<br />
1.9 percent. Notwithstanding lower growth rates, absolute quantities involved are substantial:<br />
cereals production must increase by 940 million tonnes to reach 3 billion tonnes projected for<br />
<strong>2050</strong>; meat by 196 million tonnes to reach 455 million tonnes by <strong>2050</strong>; and oilcrops by 133<br />
million tonnes to reach 282 million tonnes by <strong>2050</strong>.<br />
The fact that world’s natural resources and <strong>the</strong> yield growth potential may be sufficient<br />
to attain <strong>the</strong>se increases represents per se no guarantee that such increases will be<br />
forthcoming. Underlying our projections is <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> necessary investments will<br />
be undertaken, and <strong>the</strong> right policies will be followed providing incentives to farmers,<br />
particularly in countries whose food demand must be primarily satisfied by domestic<br />
production.<br />
These are global magnitudes, but <strong>the</strong>y are built up from country by country and<br />
commodity by commodity projections. If we had analysed <strong>the</strong> issues by treating <strong>the</strong> world as<br />
one entity or a few major regions, we could stop here and conclude that all is well and <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are no major constraints to producing all <strong>the</strong> food required for <strong>the</strong> growing population and <strong>the</strong><br />
improvement of per capita consumption to levels that would eliminate hunger and some more.<br />
However, as often, <strong>the</strong> devil is in <strong>the</strong> details. It is recalled that thirteen countries account for<br />
60 percent of <strong>the</strong> 1.4 billion ha of <strong>the</strong> global land classified as prime or good for rainfed crop<br />
production but not yet so used, and that are not in forest, protected areas or built-up. At <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r extreme, many countries have no such land reserves left, and often cultivate land of<br />
marginal quality.<br />
Addressing <strong>the</strong> issue how much and what food can be produced or imported in each<br />
country, forces us to tone down such optimism. This is because, as noted, several countries<br />
start with adverse initial conditions, of low national average food availability, high<br />
undernourishment, high population growth and also poor land and water resource<br />
18