14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 / Sensors / Accelerometers<br />

_ _<br />

3.5.3.1 IMU Case Misalignment Error<br />

Manufacturing tolerances mean that the case containing the accelerometers<br />

is rotated with respect to the Missile Body frame, an alignment error that<br />

preserves sensor triad orthogonality. For small angles, assuming that the<br />

expected error is the same about each axis,<br />

D<br />

B<br />

D<br />

D B<br />

( 0 , σ ) ⇒ f : = [ I + ∆E<br />

] f<br />

∆ E ∈ N<br />

⋅<br />

IMU<br />

MA<br />

3.5-3<br />

r,<br />

u<br />

3<br />

B<br />

r,<br />

u<br />

Equation 3.5-1<br />

The IMU case misalignment error is initialised from a zero-mean Gaussian<br />

distribution with a deviation of (IMUσMA). This error is common to both<br />

gyroscope and accelerometer triads and is computed in both sensor modules<br />

so that they can be activated in isolation.<br />

3.5.3.2 Sensor Triad Non-Orthogonality Error<br />

The orientation of each sensor axis with respect to the case results in a nonorthogonality<br />

error between sensors that is initialised from a zero-mean<br />

Gaussian distribution with a deviation of (ACσNO). If the expected error is<br />

the same for each axis,<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i D<br />

{ R , P , Y } ⇒ f : = [ I + ∆E<br />

] ⋅ ( M f )<br />

∀ i ∈<br />

⋅<br />

r,<br />

u<br />

3<br />

D<br />

B<br />

r,<br />

u<br />

Equation 3.5-2<br />

When selected values from symmetrical statistical distributions the sign of<br />

the rotations in the transform are irrelevant. Although the input axes are<br />

nominally aligned with Missile Body axes, the Hinge (output) and<br />

Pendulum axes can be selected to minimise acceleration sensitive drifts.<br />

The dominant g-sensitive biases are stimulated by accelerations along the<br />

Input and Pendulum axes.<br />

The configurations shown in Figure 3-34 and Figure 3-35 contain 6 of the<br />

possible 12 sensor orientations (6 more are obtained by rotating each input<br />

axis through 180°). The negative signs in these figures indicate that the<br />

positive axis is in the opposite direction to that shown.<br />

For each sensor, let the (X,Y,Z) Missile Body axes be aligned with the<br />

Input-Hinge-Pendulum (I,H,P) sensor axes such that a clockwise pendulum<br />

motion about the Hinge axis implies positive output and input accelerations.<br />

The configurations in Figure 3-34 and Figure 3-35 minimise torque due to<br />

missile lateral and longitudinal acceleration respectively. For the orientation<br />

shown in Figure 3-34 the mapping of the case inputs to the (I,H,P) axes for<br />

mechanical RPY accelerometers is the same as that for the gyroscopes in<br />

§3.4.3.2. For solid state devices that are insensitive to acceleration induced<br />

errors the mappings are simply the identity matrix.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!