14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6 / Missile Guidance<br />

_ _<br />

− ϕ<br />

CSA<br />

⋅ ρ<br />

A<br />

ZG 2<br />

ZG ZG MV ZG B B G<br />

( P ) ⋅ P&<br />

⋅ C ( M ( P , P&<br />

) , ξ ( P , T ( Q ) ⋅ P&<br />

) )<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

D<br />

m<br />

6-7<br />

F<br />

XB<br />

D<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

: =<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

The drag force variation with geodetic height,<br />

∂ F<br />

∂ P<br />

XB<br />

D<br />

ZG<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

: =<br />

XB<br />

D<br />

F<br />

ρ<br />

A<br />

∂ ρ<br />

⋅<br />

∂ P<br />

A<br />

ZG<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

F<br />

+<br />

C<br />

XB<br />

D<br />

D<br />

B<br />

∂ C<br />

⋅<br />

∂ M<br />

D<br />

m<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

G<br />

∂ M<br />

⋅<br />

∂ P<br />

G<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

Equation 6.4-3<br />

m<br />

ZG<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

Equation 6.4-4<br />

The drag coefficient variation with Mach number and incidence is<br />

determined using central differences with (∆Mm := 0.05; ∆σm := 0.5°). The<br />

drag variation with speed,<br />

∂ F<br />

∂ P&<br />

XB<br />

D<br />

G<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

: =<br />

2 ⋅ F<br />

XB<br />

⋅ P&<br />

XB<br />

⎛<br />

( ) ⎟ ⎟<br />

D d,<br />

m D ⎜ D B<br />

D m<br />

+ ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅<br />

2<br />

⎜ MV G<br />

G<br />

P&<br />

CD<br />

∂ ξB<br />

∂ P&<br />

∂ Mm<br />

∂ P&<br />

d, m<br />

G<br />

F<br />

⎝<br />

∂ C<br />

∂ ξ<br />

MV<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

∂ C<br />

∂ M<br />

Equation 6.4-5<br />

The drag variation with missile body orientation with respect to LGA,<br />

∂ F<br />

XB<br />

D<br />

B<br />

G<br />

∂ Q<br />

: =<br />

XB<br />

D<br />

F<br />

C<br />

D<br />

⋅<br />

∂ C<br />

∂ ξ<br />

D<br />

MV<br />

B<br />

∂ ξ<br />

⋅<br />

∂ Q<br />

MV<br />

B<br />

B<br />

G<br />

d,<br />

m<br />

⎞<br />

⎠<br />

Equation 6.4-6<br />

The missile body incidence variation with velocity and orientation are<br />

defined in §16,16. The remaining gradients are defined in §19.3.<br />

6.5 Missile Guidance - Proportional Navigation<br />

6.5.1 Historical Perspective<br />

The first published assessments of Pure Proportional Navigation (PPN) and<br />

True Proportional Navigation (TPN) apply linear analysis to the relative<br />

missile and target motion in the plane containing their constant velocity<br />

vectors. The solution of the highly non-linear PN equations has been a<br />

fruitful area of research and one that has taken time even for the simplest<br />

cases involving non-manoeuvring targets. The constant speed limitation of<br />

these initial analyses has gradually been eroded. Generalised of TPN and<br />

PPN laws have to a great extent seen a unification in the analysis however,<br />

the purely analytical approach has largely been superseded by optimal LQR<br />

techniques as more flexibility has been added. This review charts the<br />

evolution of PN guidance laws.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!