14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.5.3 Singer Filter Tuning<br />

The Singer filter system noise was not tuned, it was set to 80 m/s 2<br />

representing a sustained 9 g manoeuvre (5 g in each Cartesian axis). Figure<br />

9-46 and shows the position and acceleration errors when tracking the “U”<br />

turn test trajectory. The injection of large amounts of process noise means<br />

that the tracking errors remain high, with mean PVA errors over the 20 s<br />

sampling interval of 19 ± 3 m, 54 ± 14 m/s and 83 ± 19 m/s 2 respectively.<br />

TG_P_MET [metres]<br />

TG_A_MET [m/sec**2]<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30<br />

TIME [seconds]<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30<br />

TIME [seconds]<br />

Figure 9-46<br />

Singer Filter - Position and Acceleration Errors, ( PIP ) and ( PIA )<br />

These results reinforce the comments of Mazor [M.2] that the classical use of<br />

filters with large amounts of system noise make them oblivious to small<br />

dynamic changes, whereas hybrid systems such as the IMM are expected to<br />

remain responsive.<br />

9-27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!