14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1 / Introduction<br />

_ _<br />

concludes with a description of the tracking simulator, its control and<br />

interaction with the target and sensor simulators, and the simulation<br />

infrastructure.<br />

1.3.4 Chapter 6 : Conventional Missile Guidance<br />

§2 to §5 provide the target and missile data required for missile guidance.<br />

§6 closes the loop on this process through the autopilot, starting with a<br />

description of the missile simulator, its interaction with preceding<br />

simulators, and the simulation infrastructure. It ends with the conversion of<br />

the guidance demands into STT and BTT missile motion first constrained by<br />

the launcher, then by speed dependent g-limiting up to Mach 1, before freeflight.<br />

The order of presentation is dictated by the simulator, starting with<br />

missile mass, thrust and drag characteristics, and their Jacobians for<br />

trajectory optimisation. The focus of §6 thereafter is on conventional<br />

guidance laws, as distinct from on-line trajectory optimisation dealt with in<br />

§7.<br />

Fossier [F.2] reviews the course of sensor development and its links with<br />

conventional missile command (3 point), homing (2 point), and inertial<br />

guidance since World War 2. Inertial guidance to a geodetic reference point<br />

is the province of long range ballistic and cruise missiles, although it can be<br />

employed for mid-course guidance of medium-range missiles. Command<br />

guidance uses ground-based target tracking data and up-linked CLOS<br />

guidance commands. Homing guidance is autonomous using seeker data<br />

and PN guidance commands.<br />

By the mid-60s the improvement in radar tracking and ground processing<br />

capacity proved irresistible and expensive seekers/PN were replaced by<br />

radar/CLOS in many air-defence systems. These systems rely on up-linked<br />

steering commands to eliminate the differential angle between the missile<br />

and target after “gathering” into the radar beam. Phased array radar<br />

technology introduced in the 80s uses separate beams to reduce the initial<br />

gathering acceleration demands. These systems have proven remarkably<br />

adaptable considering the advances in target manoeuvrability and defensive<br />

countermeasures. However, both command and homing guidance systems<br />

can be compromised by reliance on a single sensor exhibiting sub-optimal<br />

characteristics during some part of the engagement. By the late-80s it was<br />

recognised that their performance could not be improved indefinitely and so<br />

research began into multi-spectral seekers, data fusion and the combination<br />

of PN and CLOS. Systems are emerging in which approach angle<br />

controlled PN guidance is generated from inertial information combined<br />

with up-linked radar data before switching to homing using the reestablished<br />

seeker.<br />

A review of PN guidance laws in two and three dimensions (2D and 3D)<br />

derived by conventional solution of the underlying differential equations<br />

defining the relative motion between the missile and target. The removal of<br />

steady-state constraints is charted over 50 years and the emergence of<br />

1-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!