14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Glossary<br />

_ _<br />

9.6 Discussion<br />

9.6.1 PN Study<br />

The studies undertaken so far have proven the simulation infrastructure,<br />

target, tracking and missile simulators. The reference and state observer<br />

parameters listed in §22.3 were verified, as was the launcher, in-tube and<br />

free flight missile dynamics, in particular the low speed thresholds applied<br />

for stability when using the simplified generic model.<br />

A study of PN and CLOS guidance laws provides a performance baseline<br />

against which other guidance laws and trajectory optimisation can be<br />

judged. The laws, stimulated by reference data, were used to stimulate the<br />

guidance laws and a STT autopilot whilst engaging Target 3 (crossing) and<br />

Target 7 (weaving GOT) with an avoidance manoeuvre 2 s from impact.<br />

The IMM filters are tuned in isolation to determine suitable system noise<br />

levels when tracking targets with matching dynamics using range, range-rate<br />

and angle measurements corrupted by Gaussian noise.<br />

The ATPN guidance law from §6 was selected on the basis of this study<br />

trajectory optimisation initialisation. For the crossing target a gain of 3 to<br />

3.5 results in maximum impact speed and minimum effort. The miss<br />

distance dropped sharply as the gain increases from 2 to 3, and only<br />

marginally thereafter as expected. It is known that miss distance and control<br />

effort minimisation against manoeuvring targets requires a gain of 4 to<br />

maximise the no escape region.<br />

PN performance against weaving targets was poor but improved as the gain,<br />

and hence bandwidth, were reduced. The implication being that PN<br />

performance can be improved given target manoeuvre discrimination,<br />

perhaps using the IMM filter probabilities, or the output from the missile<br />

state observer. For example, make the PN gain a function of the IMM<br />

weave filter probability with an upper threshold of 0.5,<br />

λ<br />

m<br />

9-28<br />

0.<br />

5<br />

( 1 − UL 4 )<br />

: = 4 ⋅ µ<br />

0<br />

Equation 9.6-1<br />

This places the onus on the IMM to properly reflect the dynamic mode of<br />

the system. At low speeds, target acceleration compensated PN performs<br />

badly as it tries to establish a collision course against the weaving target.<br />

This form of compensation should be introduced as a function of Mach<br />

number limited to a value of 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!