14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 / Missile State Observer<br />

_ _<br />

The sensors provide raw measurements (plots) that are integrated, usually<br />

asynchronously, by a central state observer. Although this places a large,<br />

and often unacceptable, computational load on the central processor, it is the<br />

only architecture that can achieve fully optimal results. In de-centralised<br />

systems, initially studied by Singer [S.22] , the output from each sensor is<br />

processed to form an optimal track. The local tracks are passed to a central<br />

processor that selects the appropriate data using a voting algorithm, or<br />

performs track fusion as shown in Figure 5-2. Although track fusion is<br />

more robust for multiple target engagements, it being less sensitive to<br />

measurement cross correlation errors than measurement fusion, the results<br />

obtained are sub-optimal.<br />

MISSILE<br />

SEEKER<br />

TARGET IMM<br />

TRACKS<br />

IMM<br />

TARGET FILTER<br />

FUSION<br />

5-4<br />

MISSILE<br />

MEASUREMENT<br />

AND TARGET<br />

TRACK FUSION<br />

MISSILE<br />

IMU<br />

MISSILE<br />

MEASUREMENTS<br />

GROUND<br />

TRACKER<br />

Figure 5-3 : Hybrid Fusion Architecture<br />

The hybrid architecture in Figure 5-3 fuses the external tracks received by<br />

the central processor into an observer that is also updated by local sensor<br />

measurements. This is the architecture of choice for air-defence in which<br />

ground based radar target plots are processed and the resulting track uplinked<br />

to the missile. The ground tracker invariably possesses more<br />

computing capacity than the missile and can accommodate relatively<br />

complex tracking algorithms thereby reducing the load on the central<br />

processor. The down-side is the increased up-link bandwidth required to<br />

deliver the track data compared with simple target plots.<br />

The missile state observer provides optimal data for guidance. This data is<br />

obtained from the observer state that combines gyroscope, accelerometer<br />

and seeker data, with up-linked radar target tracks from the IMM, and<br />

missile position and range rate measurements as shown in Figure 5-4. The<br />

observer is partitioned into target linear, missile linear and missile angular<br />

states. The IMU drives both missile partitions, whilst the seeker data is used<br />

by all of them, thereby providing the sensor measurement redundancy<br />

needed for sensor error estimation. The gyroscope triad plays a pivotal role<br />

and is the one critical sensor for missile stabilisation and seeker acquisition.<br />

The up-linked missile data is used in the missile linear state partition. The<br />

up-linked target track states cannot be treated simply as measurements since<br />

the IMM states are correlated and may destabilise the fusion filter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!