14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1 / Introduction<br />

_ _<br />

simpler optimal guidance solutions in the 80s. It is the Linear Quadratic<br />

Regulator (LQR) problem, and its solution via the Ricatti equation, that<br />

forms the link with the “open-loop” trajectory optimisation. The LQR is a<br />

Bolza Two-Point-Boundary-Value-Problem (TPBVP) constrained to linear<br />

systems and a quadratic Performance Index (PI), thereby limiting its<br />

potential.<br />

Basic and augmented forms of PN are provided, highlighting their<br />

sensitivity to parasitic errors and the relationship between the kinematic<br />

gain and time-to-go estimates. Similarly, CLOS feed-forward and stability<br />

acceleration demands are derived incorporating weave tuning by Vorley [V.3] ,<br />

and compensation for straight flying targets introduced by Lee [L.4] . These<br />

conventional guidance laws provide an insight into the closed form<br />

optimisation and the cost functions used in their derivation, information that<br />

can be exploited in open-loop formulations. They are used for missile<br />

model proving since their underlying principles are relatively simple<br />

compared with open-loop equivalents, and to create a performance baseline<br />

to compared with on-line trajectory optimisation; the province of §9.<br />

1.3.5 Chapter 7 : Trajectory Optimisation<br />

Increasing coverage, rear hemisphere engagements, higher impact speeds<br />

and controlled approach angles avoiding jamming regions to improve kill<br />

probability against agile targets requires sophisticated trajectory<br />

optimisation. Such optimisation irrefutably improves performance<br />

dependent on the PI used compared with conventional missile guidance in<br />

respect of,<br />

• Increased impact speed for given range<br />

• Increased coverage for a given impact speed<br />

• Increased warhead lethality by approaching the target at an optimal aspect<br />

• Reduce impact time for close-range high speed engagements<br />

• Compensate for model mismatches and abnormal missile performance<br />

• Increased resistance to target electronic counter-measures<br />

• Avoidance of exclusion zones<br />

• Maintenance of up-link communications<br />

• Maintain sensor tracking-lock within pointing and beam-width limitations<br />

• Promote a smooth transition of from mid-coarse to terminal guidance<br />

• Improve state observability<br />

Off-line optimisation often involves approximations over a range of<br />

engagement scenarios that are detrimental to those few cases actually<br />

encountered. Indeed LQR solutions, if they exist, tend to over-control with<br />

emphasis on the terminal conditions, Archer [A.1] . Posing closed loop<br />

1-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!