14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 / Sensors / Seeker<br />

_ _<br />

3.9 Missile Seeker<br />

3.9.1 Review<br />

The development of RF and IR seekers, from the continuous wave devices<br />

of the 60s to the phased and staring arrays of today is an immense subject.<br />

The 60s single element detectors were capable of lock-before-launch against<br />

short-range targets with a tail-on aspect. During the 70s multiple element<br />

devices provided improved counter-measure performance. Dual frequency<br />

sensors were introduced in the 80s improving range with an all aspect<br />

attack. The single frequency imaging seekers of the 90s provide aim-point<br />

refinement with increasing FoR to 50°-60° off-boresight with clutter and<br />

counter-measure rejection. The next decade will bring all-weather Multi-<br />

Spectral Seekers (MSS) combining RF/IR and Laser/IR for stealth, 3D<br />

imaging to obtain range data, increased acquisition ranges, and<br />

improvement in clutter and countermeasure rejection.<br />

The phased array radar, once restricted to large facilities such as Pave-Paws<br />

for ICBM launch detection and Aegis class missile frigates, is now used in<br />

aircraft, and even missiles. Future RF improvements are expected in the<br />

Pulse Repetition Frequencies (PRF) used, and in frequency agility to<br />

improve jamming resistance, reducing glint errors, and avoiding range and<br />

range-rate ambiguities.<br />

Passive IR seekers with staring arrays are an important alternative to active<br />

RF devices with a number of modern short-range missiles using IR staring<br />

arrays. These impose exacting demands on the gimbal controllers to<br />

provide inertial stabilisation thereby preventing image smearing that reduces<br />

acquisition range. This requires smaller integration times commensurate<br />

with the high frame rates needed for agile missiles. The cost of ensuring<br />

that array elements remain in their response range with uniform random<br />

noise, spectral response and photon conversion is inevitably increasing. The<br />

presence of dead-elements and fixed pattern noise requires calibration,<br />

element acceptance criteria, and complex signal processing.<br />

The MSS warrants special attention since it will be a catalyst for air-defence<br />

sensor data fusion. Conceptually the MSS contains two sensors operating<br />

on different wavelengths providing resistance to countermeasures, clutter,<br />

false alarms etc. The IR staring array provides accurate bearing and<br />

elevation measurements whilst the RF phased array adds range, range rate,<br />

and a second source of less accurate angular data. If radome transmittance<br />

at high off-boresight angles permits, the two sensors may use a common<br />

gimbal arrangement, and hence a single aperture. Alternatively, and more<br />

likely, two sets of gimbals and separate apertures will be required, each<br />

system being developed separately. Although ideal for modular design, the<br />

state observers and more complex autopilot will be required to point each<br />

sensor at the target, the acquiring sensor steering the other onto the target.<br />

3.9-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!