14.02.2013 Views

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

Thesis - Leigh Moody.pdf - Bad Request - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6 / Missile Guidance<br />

_ _<br />

Open-Loop Gain (db)<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

-40<br />

-360 -270 -180<br />

Open-Loop Phase (deg)<br />

-90<br />

-40 db<br />

0<br />

6-24<br />

1 db<br />

3 db<br />

6 db<br />

0.5 db<br />

0.25 db<br />

0 db<br />

-1 db<br />

-3 db<br />

-6 db<br />

-12 db<br />

-20 db<br />

Figure 6-5 : Pole Placement Nichols Chart<br />

CLOSED LOOP GAIN ( DB )<br />

Solid – Simplified loop ; Dashed – Full loop<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

10 -1<br />

10 0<br />

FREQUENCY ( HZ )<br />

Figure 6-6 : Closed Loop Frequency Response<br />

Solid – Pole Placement ; Dashed – Double Phase Advance<br />

The double phase advance requires a beam stiffness (gain) of 23 (m/s 2 )/m<br />

compared with 13.6 (m/s 2 )/m to meet the 2 Hz closed loop bandwidth<br />

shown in Figure 6-6. Although it is a little more responsive at low<br />

frequencies it has a lower phase margin of 35°.<br />

Fox also states that for good CLOS performance the tracking and autopilot<br />

bandwidths (ωE := 3ωG) and (ωA := 8ωG). In this example this equates to<br />

1.8 Hz and 4.7 Hz, the guidance bandwidth (ωG) being √13.6. When<br />

dealing with weaving targets (ωG) must be considerably larger than weave<br />

frequency. However, as fin noise is sensitive to high (ωG) and tracking<br />

accuracy is sacrificed which is why CLOS performance is often poor against<br />

weaving targets.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!