Les liaisons fructueuses - RUIG-GIAN
Les liaisons fructueuses - RUIG-GIAN
Les liaisons fructueuses - RUIG-GIAN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and Development) Capacity Building Task Force<br />
on Trade, Environment and Development, which<br />
was critical to the project’s overall success. A widerange<br />
of expertise (e.g. in law as well as social and<br />
natural sciences) was brought to bear in the project’s<br />
implementation through the above-mentioned mix<br />
of international partners, a multidisciplinary International<br />
Advisory Group and intersectoral steering<br />
committees and review teams at the national level.<br />
Strengths and challenges<br />
Although the <strong>GIAN</strong> initiative provided a unique<br />
opportunity, it was not without its challenges. Principal<br />
among these, and also the greatest strength<br />
within the initiative, was the requirement that all<br />
projects must be done in partnership with Genevabased<br />
academic institutions.<br />
Orchids are heavily traded species, listed in Appendix II<br />
of CITES. Appendix II lists species that are not necessarily<br />
now threatened with extinction but that may become<br />
so unless trade is closely controlled.<br />
Although the CITES Parties made their support for<br />
national wildlife trade policies clear, the mandate<br />
did not include funding. Rather, the governments<br />
called on the CITES Secretariat to work with other<br />
IGOs, such as UNEP, to identify potential funding<br />
sources. However, few, if any, wildlife trade policy<br />
reviews had ever been conducted previously, making<br />
many traditional bilateral donors hesitant to invest<br />
deeply in this undeveloped, and untested, area.<br />
For this reason, the <strong>GIAN</strong> initiative seemed like<br />
an excellent fit. As an initiative that is based on the<br />
pursuit of joint academic research, the initiative<br />
was well-suited to the groundbreaking nature of the<br />
project. The <strong>GIAN</strong> financial contribution was used<br />
to leverage matching funds from the joint UNEP-<br />
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade<br />
In moving this project proposal forward we needed<br />
to first identify a potential academic partner<br />
with expertise and interest in wildlife trade policy<br />
reviews. At the end of the day, this proved easier<br />
than initially envisioned. After reaching out to some<br />
academic contacts, the <strong>GIAN</strong> Secretariat helped put<br />
us in touch with Professor Marc Hufty of the then<br />
Graduate Institute of Development Studies (IUED).<br />
At the time, Professor Hufty was completing some<br />
field research in Latin America and after a few initial<br />
discussions it became clear that his research on<br />
environmental governance and the objective of the<br />
project would complement each other well.<br />
From our initial meetings, through development of<br />
the project application and ultimately project implementation,<br />
the collaboration between the three<br />
principal partners has been rich and intense. It has<br />
not been unusual through periods of the project for<br />
the team to meet bi-weekly to work on aspects of<br />
project implementation. In addition, the core document<br />
of the project, a framework for reviewing wildlife<br />
trade policies, was developed jointly among all<br />
the partners. This closeness in collaboration meant<br />
that the partners had to first improve their mutual<br />
understanding of each other’s interests and institu-<br />
Enhancing National Capacities to Assess Wildlife Trade Policies in Support of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered<br />
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)<br />
Coordinator : Hussein Abaza<br />
109