Références bibliographiques Bradley, R.E., Radhakrishnan, C.V., Patil-Kulkarni, C.G., Loggins, P.E., 1973, Responses in Florida Native and Rambouillet lambs exposed to one and two oral doses of Haemonchus contortus. Am J Vet Res 34, 729-735. Bricarello, P.A., Gennari, S.M., Oliveira-Sequeira, T.C.G., Vaz, C.M.S.L., Gonçalves <strong>de</strong> Gonçalves, I., Echevarria, F.A.M., 2004, Worm bur<strong>de</strong>n and immunological responses in Corriedale and Crioula Lanada sheep following natural infection with Haemonchus contortus. Small Ruminant Research 51, 75-83. Brown, M.A., Pierce, J.H., Watson, C.J., Falco, J., Ihle, J.N., Paul, W.E., 1987, B cell stimulatory factor- 1/interleukin-4 mRNA is expressed by normal and transformed mast cells. Cell 50, 809-818. Brown, W.C., Rice-Ficht, A.C., Estes, D.M., 1998, Bovine type 1 and type 2 responses. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 63, 45-55. Buddle, B.M., Jowett, G., Green, R.S., Douch, P.G., Risdon, P.L., 1992, Association of blood eosinophilia with the expression of resistance in Romney lambs to nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>. Int J Parasitol 22, 955-960. Bueno, L., 1982, Comment s'expliquent les troubles digestifs liés à l'haemonchose ovine ? Point Vétérinaire 13, 33-39. Burke, J.M., Miller, J.E., 2002, Relative resistance of Dorper crossbred ewes to <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong>de</strong> infection compared with St. Croix and Katahdin ewes in the southeastern United States. Vet Parasitol 109, 265-275. Butterworth, A.E., Sturrock, R.F., Houba, V., Mahmoud, A.A., Sher, A., Rees, P.H., 1975, Eosinophils as mediators of antibody-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt damage to schistosomula. Nature 256, 727-729. Butterworth, A.E., 1984, Cell-mediated damage to helminths. Adv Parasitol 23, 143-235. Cabaret, J., 2004, Parasitisme helminthique en élevage biologique ovin : réalités et moyens <strong>de</strong> contrôle. INRA Productions Animales 17. Canals, A., Zarlenga, D.S., Almeria, S., Gasbarre, L.C., 1997, Cytokine profile induced by a primary infection with Ostertagia ostertagi in cattle. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 58, 63-75. Capron, M., Nogueira-Queiroz, J.A., Papin, J.P., Capron, A., 1984, Interactions between eosinophils and antibodies: in vivo protective role against rat schistosomiasis. Cell Immunol 83, 60-72. Capron, M., 1993, Eosinophiles et maladies parasitaires. Aspects fonctionnels. Editions Techniques - Encycl. Med. Chir. Maladies infectieuses - Pédiatrie, 4p. Charon, K.M., Gruszczynska, J., Moskwa, B., 2000, Relationship between polymorphism in DRB1 gene and nemato<strong>de</strong> fecal egg count in sheep. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Animal Genetics, Abstract C011. Chartier, C., Soubirac, F., Pors, I., Silvestre, A., Hubert, J., Couquet, C., Cabaret, J., 2001, Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance in <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> of dairy goats un<strong>de</strong>r extensive management conditions in southwestern France. J Helminthol 75, 325-330. Chatila, T.A., 2005, Role of regulatory T cells in human diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol 116, 949-959; quiz 960. Chermette, R., 1982, L'haemonchose ovine et ses particularités : importance et situation actuelle en France. Point Vétérinaire 13, 21-28. Claerebout, E., Hil<strong>de</strong>rson, H., Meeus, P., De Marez, T., Behnke, J., Huntley, J., Vercruysse, J., 1996, The effect of truncated infections with Ostertagia ostertagi on the <strong>de</strong>velopment of acquired resistance in calves. Vet Parasitol 66, 225-239. 214
Références bibliographiques Claerebout, E., Dorny, P., Agneessens, J., Demeulenaere, D., Vercruysse, J., 1999, The effect of first season chemoprophylaxis in calves on second season pasture contamination and acquired resistance and resilience to <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>. Vet Parasitol 80, 289-301. Claerebout, E., Vercruysse, J., 2000, The immune response and the evaluation of acquired immunity against <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> in cattle: a review. Parasitology 120 Suppl, S25-42. Clark, R., Kupper, T., 2005, Old meets new: the interaction between innate and adaptive immunity. J Invest Dermatol 125, 629-637. Coffman, R.L., von <strong>de</strong>r Weid, T., 1997, Multiple pathways for the initiation of T helper 2 (Th2) responses. J Exp Med 185, 373-375. Coles, G.C., Borgstee<strong>de</strong>, F.H., Geerts, S., 1994, Recommendations for the control of anthelmintic resistant nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> of farm animals in the EU. Vet Rec 134, 205-206. Coles, G.C., 2005, Anthelmintic resistance--looking to the future: a UK perspective. Res Vet Sci 78, 99-108. Coltman, D.W., Wilson, K., Pilkington, J.G., Stear, M.J., Pemberton, J.M., 2001, A microsatellite polymorphism in the gamma interferon gene is associated with resistance to <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> in a naturallyparasitized population of Soay sheep. Parasitology 122, 571-582. Coop, R.L., 1981, Feed intake and utilization by the parasitized ruminant. In : Isotypes and Radiation in Parasitology VI. Vienna: IAEA. Coop, R.L., Holmes, P.H., 1996, Nutrition and parasite interaction. Int J Parasitol 26, 951-962. Coop, R.L., Kyriazakis, I., 1999, Nutrition-parasite interaction. Vet Parasitol 84, 187-204. Coop, R.L., Kyriazakis, I., 2001, Influence of host nutrition on the <strong>de</strong>velopment and consequences of nemato<strong>de</strong> parasitism in ruminants. Trends Parasitol 17, 325-330. Cooper, P.J., Chico, M.E., Sandoval, C., Espinel, I., Guevara, A., Kennedy, M.W., Urban Jr, J.F., Griffin, G.E., Nutman, T.B., 2000, Human infection with Ascaris lumbricoi<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> is associated with a polarized cytokine response. J Infect Dis 182, 1207-1213. Courtney, C.H., Parker, C.F., McClure, K.E., Herd, R.P., 1984, A comparison of the periparturient rise in fecal egg counts of exotic and domestic ewes. Int J Parasitol 14, 377-381. Courtney, C.H., Parker, C.F., McClure, K.E., Herd, R.P., 1985, Resistance of nonlambing exotic and domestic ewes to naturally acquired <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>. Int J Parasitol 15, 239-243. Coyne, M.J., Smith, G., Johnstone, C., 1991, A study of the mortality and fecundity of Haemonchus contortus in sheep following experimental infections. Int J Parasitol 21, 847-853. Coyne, M.J., Smith, G., 1992a, The <strong>de</strong>velopment and mortality of the free-living stages of Haemonchus contortus in laboratory culture. Int J Parasitol 22, 641-650. Coyne, M.J., Smith, G., 1992b, The mortality and fecundity of Haemonchus contortus in parasite-naive and parasite-exposed sheep following single experimental infections. Int J Parasitol 22, 315-325. Coyne, C.P., Brake, D., 2001, Characterisation of Haemonchus contortus-<strong>de</strong>rived cell <strong>populations</strong> propagated in vitro in a tissue culture environment and their potential to induce protective immunity in sheep. Int J Parasitol 31, 359-376. Crawford, A.M., McEwan, J.C., Dodds, K.G., Wright, C.S., Bisset, S.A., MacDonald, P.A., Knowler, K.J., Greer, G.J., Shaw, R.J., Paterson, K.A., Cuthbertson, R.P., Vlassoff, A., Squire, D.R., West, C.J., Phua, S.H., 1997, Resistance to nemato<strong>de</strong> parasites in sheep : how important are the MHC genes ? Proc Assoc Adv Anim Breed Gen 12, 58-62. 215
- Page 1 and 2:
N° d’ordre : 2346 THESE présent
- Page 3 and 4:
A mon très cher et respecté « co
- Page 5 and 6:
4.3.3. Mise en place et rôle des e
- Page 7 and 8:
ANNEXE A L’ARTICLE « HAEMONCHUS
- Page 9 and 10:
Un problème économique … et sci
- Page 11 and 12:
1. GENERALITES SUR LES STRONGLES GA
- Page 13 and 14:
1.2. Le cycle biologique des Tricho
- Page 15 and 16:
Contexte bibliographique 1.3. Les d
- Page 17 and 18:
Contexte bibliographique • Haemon
- Page 19 and 20:
Contexte bibliographique Les princi
- Page 21 and 22:
Famille Molécule Noms déposés Be
- Page 23 and 24:
Contexte bibliographique été déc
- Page 25 and 26:
Contexte bibliographique Pendant de
- Page 27 and 28:
3.1. Tarir les sources de contamina
- Page 29 and 30:
Contexte bibliographique germer dan
- Page 31 and 32:
Contexte bibliographique Le tableau
- Page 33 and 34:
*La vaccination contre Trichostrong
- Page 35 and 36:
3.2.3. La sélection de la résista
- Page 37 and 38:
LIEU DE L’ETUDE RACES ETUDIEES /
- Page 39 and 40:
*Sélection au sein d’une même r
- Page 41 and 42:
Contexte bibliographique sont pas r
- Page 43 and 44:
Contexte bibliographique responders
- Page 45 and 46:
Contexte bibliographique et al., 20
- Page 47 and 48:
Contexte bibliographique Toutefois,
- Page 49 and 50:
Contexte bibliographique 4. LA REPO
- Page 51 and 52:
Contexte bibliographique Dans le do
- Page 53 and 54:
Contexte bibliographique et Janeway
- Page 55 and 56:
Contexte bibliographique réponses
- Page 57 and 58:
Contexte bibliographique americanus
- Page 59 and 60:
Contexte bibliographique - une mast
- Page 61 and 62:
Contexte bibliographique Le mécani
- Page 63 and 64:
Contexte bibliographique cellulaire
- Page 65 and 66:
Contexte bibliographique suppressio
- Page 67 and 68:
Contexte bibliographique de résist
- Page 69 and 70:
Contexte bibliographique Ainsi, l
- Page 71 and 72:
*Réduction de la taille des vers a
- Page 73 and 74:
4.3.5. Régulation de la réponse i
- Page 75 and 76:
Contexte bibliographique d’infest
- Page 77 and 78:
Contexte bibliographique Figure n°
- Page 79 and 80:
Objectifs des travaux de thèse CHA
- Page 81 and 82:
Objectifs des travaux de thèse Dan
- Page 83 and 84:
1. MODELES EXPERIMENTAUX 1.1. Les a
- Page 85 and 86:
Procédures expérimentales mais n
- Page 87 and 88:
Procédures expérimentales 2.3. Et
- Page 89 and 90:
Procédures expérimentales être e
- Page 91 and 92:
Procédures expérimentales suivie
- Page 93 and 94:
Procédures expérimentales avec un
- Page 95 and 96:
Procédures expérimentales de la p
- Page 97 and 98:
ISOTYPE Type d’antigène Concentr
- Page 99 and 100:
Procédures expérimentales (i) des
- Page 101 and 102:
6.1.4. Immunohistochimie sur coupes
- Page 103 and 104:
Procédures expérimentales éviden
- Page 105 and 106:
Procédures expérimentales - cultu
- Page 107 and 108:
Résultats CHAPITRE V : RESULTATS 1
- Page 109 and 110:
Résultats - à la polarisation Th1
- Page 111 and 112:
Vet. Res. 37 (2006) 1-16 © INRA, E
- Page 113 and 114:
ut no clinical signs of coccidiosis
- Page 115 and 116:
gene sequence was not known (Eotaxi
- Page 117 and 118:
-20 °C acetone bath before drying.
- Page 119 and 120:
Th 2 response in H. contortus infec
- Page 121 and 122:
significant systemic CEL 3 specific
- Page 123 and 124:
3.5.4. Reduced fecal egg output At
- Page 125 and 126:
populations in sheep exposed to con
- Page 127 and 128:
Résultats Annexe à l’article «
- Page 129 and 130:
Résultats Les corrélations entre
- Page 131 and 132:
Article II : Immune responses in la
- Page 133 and 134:
1. INTRODUCTION Résultats Due to t
- Page 135 and 136:
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS 2.1. Experi
- Page 137 and 138:
Résultats RNA were digested with 1
- Page 139 and 140:
Résultats for 2h at room temperatu
- Page 141 and 142:
Résultats clone Ki-M6, Serotec, 1:
- Page 143 and 144:
3. RESULTS 3.1. Dynamics of the wor
- Page 145 and 146:
3.4. Dynamics of the duodenal cellu
- Page 147 and 148:
4. DISCUSSION Résultats In this st
- Page 149 and 150:
Résultats nematode infections elic
- Page 151 and 152:
REFERENCES Résultats Balic, A., Bo
- Page 153 and 154:
Résultats Pernthaner, A., Vlassoff
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 1 : Schematic description of
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 3 : Reagents and procedures u
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 5 : Correlations between cell
- Page 165 and 166: Résultats PARTIE II : ETUDE COMPAR
- Page 167 and 168: Résultats Article III : Dynamics o
- Page 169 and 170: 1 - INTRODUCTION Résultats The con
- Page 171 and 172: 2 - MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Expe
- Page 173 and 174: Résultats of water. Larvae were co
- Page 175 and 176: Résultats protocol. The purity of
- Page 177 and 178: Résultats macrophages/monocytes (m
- Page 179 and 180: Résultats (L4 to adults) were pres
- Page 181 and 182: Résultats in INRA 401 lambs and bl
- Page 183 and 184: Résultats experimental protocols,
- Page 185 and 186: Résultats terms of female size, eg
- Page 187 and 188: Résultats Gauly, M., Kraus, M., Ve
- Page 189 and 190: Table 1 : Schematic description of
- Page 191 and 192: Table 3 : Total worm burden, length
- Page 193 and 194: Epg Epg 30000 25000 20000 15000 100
- Page 195 and 196: Résultats 195
- Page 197 and 198: Discussion générale CHAPITRE VI :
- Page 199 and 200: Discussion générale l’excrétio
- Page 201 and 202: Discussion générale effectrices,
- Page 203 and 204: Discussion générale chez des ovin
- Page 205 and 206: Discussion générale entre J4 et J
- Page 207 and 208: Discussion générale souris infest
- Page 209 and 210: Discussion générale connaissance
- Page 211 and 212: Références bibliographiques Adams
- Page 213: Références bibliographiques Behnk
- Page 217 and 218: Références bibliographiques cytok
- Page 219 and 220: Références bibliographiques Gibbo
- Page 221 and 222: Références bibliographiques Jacks
- Page 223 and 224: Références bibliographiques Lee,
- Page 225 and 226: Références bibliographiques Monta
- Page 227 and 228: Références bibliographiques Pfeff
- Page 229 and 230: Références bibliographiques Sher,
- Page 231 and 232: Références bibliographiques paras
- Page 233 and 234: Références bibliographiques Yazwi