Références bibliographiques Crawford, A.M., 1998a, Searching for disease resistance QTL. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Animal Genetics, Abstract P010, 7-8. Crawford, A.M., McEwan, J.C., 1998b, I<strong>de</strong>ntification of animals resistant to nemato<strong>de</strong> parasite infection. New Zeland Provisional Patent 330 201, New Zeland. Culley, F.J., Brown, A., Conroy, D.M., Sabroe, I., Pritchard, D.I., Williams, T.J., 2000, Eotaxin is specifically cleaved by hookworm metalloproteases preventing its action in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol 165, 6447- 6453. Dargie, J.D., 1992, The influence of genetic factors on the resistance of ruminants to <strong>gastro</strong>-intestinal nemato<strong>de</strong> and Trypanosome infections, In: Animal Mo<strong>de</strong>ls in Parasitology (Owen, D.G., Ed.).McMillan Press Ltd, London, UK, pp. 17-51. Davies, G., Stear, M.J., Benothman, M., Abuagob, O., Kerr, A., Mitchell, S., Bishop, S.C., 2006, Quantitative trait loci associated with parasitic infection in Scottish blackface sheep. Heredity 96, 252-258. Dawkins, H.J., Windon, R.G., Eagleson, G.K., 1989, Eosinophil responses in sheep selected for high and low responsiveness to Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Int J Parasitol 19, 199-205. Dawkins, H.J., Windon, R.G., Outteridge, P.M., Dineen, J.K., 1988, Cellular and humoral responses of sheep with different levels of resistance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Int J Parasitol 18, 531-537. Del Pozo, V., De Andres, B., Martin, E., Cardaba, B., Fernan<strong>de</strong>z, J.C., Gallardo, S., Tramon, P., Leyva-Cobian, F., Palomino, P., Lahoz, C., 1992, Eosinophil as antigen-presenting cell: activation of T cell clones and T cell hybridoma by eosinophils after antigen processing. Eur J Immunol 22, 1919-1925. Desreumaux, P., Janin, A., Colombel, J.F., Prin, L., Plumas, J., Emilie, D., Torpier, G., Capron, A., Capron, M., 1992, Interleukin 5 messenger RNA expression by eosinophils in the intestinal mucosa of patients with coeliac disease. J Exp Med 175, 293-296. Diez-Tascon, C., MacDonald, P.A., Dodds, K.G., McEwan, J.C., Crawford, A.M., 2002, A screen of chromosome 1 for QTL affecting nemato<strong>de</strong> resistance in an ovine outcross population. Proc 7th World Cong Genet Appl Livest Prod, Montpellier, 19-23 August, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France, 13-37. Diez-Tascon, C., Keane, O.M., Wilson, T., Zadissa, A., Hyndman, D.L., Baird, D.B., McEwan, J.C., Crawford, A.M., 2005, Microarray analysis of selection lines from outbred <strong>populations</strong> to i<strong>de</strong>ntify genes involved with nemato<strong>de</strong> parasite resistance in sheep. Physiol Genomics 21, 59-69. Dineen, J.K., Donald, A.D., Wagland, B.M., Turner, J.H., 1965, The Dynamics of the Host-Parasite Relationship. Ii. The Response of Sheep to Primary and Secondary Infection with Nematodirus Spathiger. Parasitology 55, 163-171. Dineen, J.K., Wagland, B.M., 1966, The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship. IV. The response of sheep to gra<strong>de</strong>d and to repeated infection with Haemonchus contortus. Parasitology 56, 639-650. Dineen, J.K., Gregg, P., Lascelles, A.K., 1978, The response of lambs to vaccination at weaning with irradiated Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae: segregation into 'respon<strong>de</strong>rs' and 'non-respon<strong>de</strong>rs'. Int J Parasitol 8, 59-63. Dobson, R.J., Donald, A.D., Barnes, E.H., Waller, P.J., 1990, Population dynamics of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep: mo<strong>de</strong>l to predict the worm population over time as a function of infection rate and host age. Int J Parasitol 20, 365-373. Dobson, R.J., LeJambre, L., Gill, J.H., 1996, Management of anthelmintic resistance: inheritance of resistance and selection with persistent drugs. Int J Parasitol 26, 993-1000. Doetze, A., Satoguina, J., Burchard, G., Rau, T., Loliger, C., Fleischer, B., Hoerauf, A., 2000, Antigen-specific cellular hyporesponsiveness in a chronic human helminth infection is mediated by T(h)3/T(r)1-type 216
Références bibliographiques cytokines IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta but not by a T(h)1 to T(h)2 shift. Int Immunol 12, 623-630. Dombrowicz, D., Capron, M., 2001, Eosinophils, allergy and parasites. Curr Opin Immunol 13, 716-720. Dominik, S., 2005, Quantitative trait loci for internal nemato<strong>de</strong> resistance in sheep: a review. Genet Sel Evol 37 Suppl 1, S83-96. Dophei<strong>de</strong>, T.A., Tachedjian, M., Phillips, C., Frenkel, M.J., Wagland, B.M., Ward, C.W., 1991, Molecular characterisation of a protective, 11-kDa excretory-secretory protein from the parasitic stages of Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 45, 101-107. Douch, P.G., Harrison, G.B., Buchanan, L.L., Greer, K.S., 1983, In vitro bioassay of sheep <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal mucus for nemato<strong>de</strong> paralysing activity mediated by substances with some properties characteristic of SRS-A. Int J Parasitol 13, 207-212. Douch, P.G., Harrison, G.B., Buchanan, L.L., Brunsdon, R.V., 1984, Relationship of histamine in tissues and antiparasitic substances in <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal mucus to the <strong>de</strong>velopment of resistance to trichostrongyle infections in young sheep. Vet Parasitol 16, 273-288. Douch, P.G., Harrison, G.B., Elliott, D.C., Buchanan, L.L., Greer, K.S., 1986, Relationship of <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal histology and mucus antiparasite activity with the <strong>de</strong>velopment of resistance to trichostrongyle infections in sheep. Vet Parasitol 20, 315-331. Douch, P.G., 1988, The response of young Romney lambs to immunization with Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae. Int J Parasitol 18, 1035-1038. Douch, P.G., Morum, P.E., 1993, The effect of age on the response of Romney sheep to <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> during grazing. Int J Parasitol 23, 651-655. Douch, P.G., Green, R.S., Morris, C.A., McEewan, J.C., Windon, R.G., 1996a, Phenotypic markers for selection of nemato<strong>de</strong>-resistant sheep. Int J Parasitol 26, 899-911. Douch, P.G., Morum, P.E., Rabel, B., 1996b, Secretion of anti-parasite substances and leukotrienes from ovine <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal tissues and isolated mucosal mast cells. Int J Parasitol 26, 205-211. Durette-Desset, M.C., Chabaud, A.G., 1993, Nomenclature of Strongylidae above the family group. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 68, 111-112. Durette-Desset, M.C., Hugot, J.P., Darlu, P., Chabaud, A.G., 1999, A cladistic analysis of the Trichostrongyloi<strong>de</strong>a (Nematoda). Int J Parasitol 29, 1065-1086. Eady, S.J., Woolaston, R.R., Barger, I.A., 2003, Comparison of genetic and nongenetic strategies for control of <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> of sheep. Livestock Production Science 81, 11-23. Ehigiator, H.N., Stadnyk, A.W., Lee, T.D., 2000, Modulation of B-cell proliferative response by a soluble extract of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Infect Immun 68, 6154-6161. Else, K., Wakelin, D., 1988, The effects of H-2 and non-H-2 genes on the expulsion of the nemato<strong>de</strong> Trichuris muris from inbred and congenic mice. Parasitology 96 ( Pt 3), 543-550. Else, K.J., Grencis, R.K., 1991, Cellular immune responses to the murine nemato<strong>de</strong> parasite Trichuris muris. I. Differential cytokine production during acute or chronic infection. Immunology 72, 508-513. Else, K.J., Finkelman, F.D., 1998, Intestinal nemato<strong>de</strong> parasites, cytokines and effector mechanisms. Int J Parasitol 28, 1145-1158. Else, K.J., 2005, Have <strong>gastro</strong>intestinal nemato<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> outwitted the immune system? Parasite Immunol 27, 407-415. 217
- Page 1 and 2:
N° d’ordre : 2346 THESE présent
- Page 3 and 4:
A mon très cher et respecté « co
- Page 5 and 6:
4.3.3. Mise en place et rôle des e
- Page 7 and 8:
ANNEXE A L’ARTICLE « HAEMONCHUS
- Page 9 and 10:
Un problème économique … et sci
- Page 11 and 12:
1. GENERALITES SUR LES STRONGLES GA
- Page 13 and 14:
1.2. Le cycle biologique des Tricho
- Page 15 and 16:
Contexte bibliographique 1.3. Les d
- Page 17 and 18:
Contexte bibliographique • Haemon
- Page 19 and 20:
Contexte bibliographique Les princi
- Page 21 and 22:
Famille Molécule Noms déposés Be
- Page 23 and 24:
Contexte bibliographique été déc
- Page 25 and 26:
Contexte bibliographique Pendant de
- Page 27 and 28:
3.1. Tarir les sources de contamina
- Page 29 and 30:
Contexte bibliographique germer dan
- Page 31 and 32:
Contexte bibliographique Le tableau
- Page 33 and 34:
*La vaccination contre Trichostrong
- Page 35 and 36:
3.2.3. La sélection de la résista
- Page 37 and 38:
LIEU DE L’ETUDE RACES ETUDIEES /
- Page 39 and 40:
*Sélection au sein d’une même r
- Page 41 and 42:
Contexte bibliographique sont pas r
- Page 43 and 44:
Contexte bibliographique responders
- Page 45 and 46:
Contexte bibliographique et al., 20
- Page 47 and 48:
Contexte bibliographique Toutefois,
- Page 49 and 50:
Contexte bibliographique 4. LA REPO
- Page 51 and 52:
Contexte bibliographique Dans le do
- Page 53 and 54:
Contexte bibliographique et Janeway
- Page 55 and 56:
Contexte bibliographique réponses
- Page 57 and 58:
Contexte bibliographique americanus
- Page 59 and 60:
Contexte bibliographique - une mast
- Page 61 and 62:
Contexte bibliographique Le mécani
- Page 63 and 64:
Contexte bibliographique cellulaire
- Page 65 and 66:
Contexte bibliographique suppressio
- Page 67 and 68:
Contexte bibliographique de résist
- Page 69 and 70:
Contexte bibliographique Ainsi, l
- Page 71 and 72:
*Réduction de la taille des vers a
- Page 73 and 74:
4.3.5. Régulation de la réponse i
- Page 75 and 76:
Contexte bibliographique d’infest
- Page 77 and 78:
Contexte bibliographique Figure n°
- Page 79 and 80:
Objectifs des travaux de thèse CHA
- Page 81 and 82:
Objectifs des travaux de thèse Dan
- Page 83 and 84:
1. MODELES EXPERIMENTAUX 1.1. Les a
- Page 85 and 86:
Procédures expérimentales mais n
- Page 87 and 88:
Procédures expérimentales 2.3. Et
- Page 89 and 90:
Procédures expérimentales être e
- Page 91 and 92:
Procédures expérimentales suivie
- Page 93 and 94:
Procédures expérimentales avec un
- Page 95 and 96:
Procédures expérimentales de la p
- Page 97 and 98:
ISOTYPE Type d’antigène Concentr
- Page 99 and 100:
Procédures expérimentales (i) des
- Page 101 and 102:
6.1.4. Immunohistochimie sur coupes
- Page 103 and 104:
Procédures expérimentales éviden
- Page 105 and 106:
Procédures expérimentales - cultu
- Page 107 and 108:
Résultats CHAPITRE V : RESULTATS 1
- Page 109 and 110:
Résultats - à la polarisation Th1
- Page 111 and 112:
Vet. Res. 37 (2006) 1-16 © INRA, E
- Page 113 and 114:
ut no clinical signs of coccidiosis
- Page 115 and 116:
gene sequence was not known (Eotaxi
- Page 117 and 118:
-20 °C acetone bath before drying.
- Page 119 and 120:
Th 2 response in H. contortus infec
- Page 121 and 122:
significant systemic CEL 3 specific
- Page 123 and 124:
3.5.4. Reduced fecal egg output At
- Page 125 and 126:
populations in sheep exposed to con
- Page 127 and 128:
Résultats Annexe à l’article «
- Page 129 and 130:
Résultats Les corrélations entre
- Page 131 and 132:
Article II : Immune responses in la
- Page 133 and 134:
1. INTRODUCTION Résultats Due to t
- Page 135 and 136:
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS 2.1. Experi
- Page 137 and 138:
Résultats RNA were digested with 1
- Page 139 and 140:
Résultats for 2h at room temperatu
- Page 141 and 142:
Résultats clone Ki-M6, Serotec, 1:
- Page 143 and 144:
3. RESULTS 3.1. Dynamics of the wor
- Page 145 and 146:
3.4. Dynamics of the duodenal cellu
- Page 147 and 148:
4. DISCUSSION Résultats In this st
- Page 149 and 150:
Résultats nematode infections elic
- Page 151 and 152:
REFERENCES Résultats Balic, A., Bo
- Page 153 and 154:
Résultats Pernthaner, A., Vlassoff
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 1 : Schematic description of
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 3 : Reagents and procedures u
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 5 : Correlations between cell
- Page 165 and 166: Résultats PARTIE II : ETUDE COMPAR
- Page 167 and 168: Résultats Article III : Dynamics o
- Page 169 and 170: 1 - INTRODUCTION Résultats The con
- Page 171 and 172: 2 - MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Expe
- Page 173 and 174: Résultats of water. Larvae were co
- Page 175 and 176: Résultats protocol. The purity of
- Page 177 and 178: Résultats macrophages/monocytes (m
- Page 179 and 180: Résultats (L4 to adults) were pres
- Page 181 and 182: Résultats in INRA 401 lambs and bl
- Page 183 and 184: Résultats experimental protocols,
- Page 185 and 186: Résultats terms of female size, eg
- Page 187 and 188: Résultats Gauly, M., Kraus, M., Ve
- Page 189 and 190: Table 1 : Schematic description of
- Page 191 and 192: Table 3 : Total worm burden, length
- Page 193 and 194: Epg Epg 30000 25000 20000 15000 100
- Page 195 and 196: Résultats 195
- Page 197 and 198: Discussion générale CHAPITRE VI :
- Page 199 and 200: Discussion générale l’excrétio
- Page 201 and 202: Discussion générale effectrices,
- Page 203 and 204: Discussion générale chez des ovin
- Page 205 and 206: Discussion générale entre J4 et J
- Page 207 and 208: Discussion générale souris infest
- Page 209 and 210: Discussion générale connaissance
- Page 211 and 212: Références bibliographiques Adams
- Page 213 and 214: Références bibliographiques Behnk
- Page 215: Références bibliographiques Claer
- Page 219 and 220: Références bibliographiques Gibbo
- Page 221 and 222: Références bibliographiques Jacks
- Page 223 and 224: Références bibliographiques Lee,
- Page 225 and 226: Références bibliographiques Monta
- Page 227 and 228: Références bibliographiques Pfeff
- Page 229 and 230: Références bibliographiques Sher,
- Page 231 and 232: Références bibliographiques paras
- Page 233 and 234: Références bibliographiques Yazwi