19.03.2014 Views

Ovde - Početak

Ovde - Početak

Ovde - Početak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

193<br />

Film violence is a complex matter which can be<br />

addressed from diverse angles. There are studies that focus on<br />

the filmmaking art itself and analyse ways of capturing violence<br />

on screen, explain its aesthetisation and present the chronicles of<br />

most significant violence films. Conversely, the social/historical<br />

studies which place film violence in the context of social<br />

events and neglect its cinematographic value are notably more<br />

frequent. None of the studies that were consulted in the writing<br />

of this paper strived towards combining these two approaches<br />

in a comprehensive understanding of the construction of film<br />

violence and its influence on its audience. This paper presents<br />

an attempt to overcome this problem and explain film violence<br />

considering its key defining factors. The emphasis will be placed<br />

on three key factors that define and shape film violence: the social<br />

context, the development of the grammar of film language and<br />

the censorship. Furthermore, the paper looks at the importance<br />

of the three factors in certain chapters of the history of film. The<br />

paper, however, does not purport to give a detailed account of<br />

the film violence chronology, nor does it list all the noteworthy<br />

films for a research like this. The primary aim was to provide<br />

explanation of the cinematographic representation of violence<br />

using a limited number of most significant violence films as<br />

examples and also contemplate its social impact. Based on the<br />

three criteria which define film violence, the paper divides its<br />

cinematographic representation into two key periods. According<br />

to the shooting approach, the level of censorship imposed on<br />

the director and the social circumstances, one can recognize<br />

two chapters in film history regarding on-screen violence: the<br />

classical approach – marked by the nonexplicit aesthetics of<br />

violence – and the post-classical approach – where the explicit<br />

aesthetics of violence prevails.<br />

Moreover, apart from the attempt to explain film violence,<br />

this paper deals with the social impact of its representation. The<br />

results of empirical researches and the most striking examples<br />

of violent actions of film characters are not merely listed and<br />

outlined. They are incorporated into the framework of the moral

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!