29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Neotame 131<br />

through a systematic approach and demonstrated to be similar to that of aspartame<br />

with the exception of neotame’s greater stability in baked and dairy goods. A<br />

diketopiperazine derivative is not formed.<br />

Neotame maintains stability and functionality over a range of pHs, temperatures,<br />

and storage times representing relevant conditions of use. Traditionally,<br />

functionality and stability have been demonstrated for high-intensity sweeteners<br />

by developing data for a large number of categories. This approach generated<br />

extensive redundant data. For example, aspartame stability work was done for<br />

more than 30 different food categories, even though many of the categories have<br />

similar processing and storage conditions. A systematic, chemistry-based approach<br />

to stability testing was therefore established for neotame as determined<br />

by the key chemical and physical parameters that have an impact on the stability<br />

and functionality of a food additive (4).<br />

1. The Matrix System for Stability Determinations<br />

Functionality and chemical stability studies establish that neotame is functional<br />

as a sweetener and flavor enhancer in a variety of food applications when used<br />

in accordance with good manufacturing practices. The functionality of neotame<br />

was demonstrated with a three-dimensional food matrix representing the intended<br />

conditions of use in foods. On the basis of the experience with aspartame and<br />

knowledge of the chemistry of neotame, the three key properties of this food<br />

matrix are temperature, pH, and moisture; these determine the stability of neotame<br />

and thus its functionality under intended conditions of use. Studies on the<br />

functionality of aspartame have validated this matrix approach as a predictor of<br />

its stability and functionality in foods within the defined matrix. Similarly, if<br />

neotame is functional in foods at the edges of the matrix, it will be functional<br />

for all food applications that are within the limits of the matrix. The food applications<br />

tested in the matrix under commercially relevant processing and storage<br />

conditions are carbonated soft drinks, powdered soft drinks, baked goods (cake),<br />

yogurt, and hot-packed beverages. These foods represent the ranges of temperature,<br />

pH, and moisture relevant to neotame applications. As predicted by its chemistry,<br />

neotame’s functionality and stability are similar to that of aspartame with<br />

the exception of greater stability in baked and dairy goods. The representative<br />

positions of these categories within the matrix are shown in Fig. 2.<br />

Carbonated soft drinks (CSD), powdered soft drinks (PSD), cake, yogurt,<br />

and hot-packed still beverages make up most commercial applications for highintensity<br />

sweeteners. Taken together, these five representative products along<br />

with tabletop products account for greater than 90% of all uses for a high-intensity<br />

sweetener. Thus, these formulations were investigated for stability over the expected<br />

shelf-life of the products. Additional applications selected to assess func-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!