29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fat and Oil Replacers 527<br />

in products such as bread, cereals, and cooked potatoes. Recently identified, another<br />

type is classified as RS4. This is representative of starch that has been<br />

rendered resistant by chemical modification. Currently, no commercial products<br />

of this type exist. As knowledge of TDF developed through the 1980s, resistant<br />

starches frequently were discussed, but no significant attempts were made to commercialize<br />

them until the 1990s. The first resistant starch released and marketed<br />

as such was an RS2 based on a high-amylose corn starch hybrid. The product—<br />

Hi-Maize—was developed by Starch Australasia Ltd. and won the 1995 Australia<br />

Institute of Food Science and Technology Industry Innovation Award in<br />

Australia. Hi-Maize contained approximately 20–25% total dietary fiber and was<br />

introduced into several breads and extruded cereals as a functional fiber in Australia.<br />

In 1991, Opta Food Ingredients, Bedford, MA, was granted a U.S. patent for a<br />

concentrated, process-tolerant source of RS3-resistant starch in food applications.<br />

Independently, National Starch and Chemical Company, Bridgewater, NJ, a major<br />

food-starch producer, also was granted a U.S. patent on a common process<br />

to produce RS3 starch. The companies agreed to cooperate to commercialize this<br />

higher TDF (30%) product, resulting in the 1994 launch of two new products<br />

marketed as resistant starches—Crystalean (an Opta Food Ingredients product)<br />

and Novelose ® (a National Starch and Chemical Company product). National<br />

Starch continued to expand its Novelose line, offering products with 40% TDF.<br />

Resistant starch represents a functional fiber alternative. The RS3-resistant starch,<br />

for example, has been shown to significantly improve expansion and eating quality<br />

for extruded cereals and snacks SP. The RS2-resistant starch performs well<br />

in baked goods because of its small granule size and low water-holding capacity.<br />

The RS2 product can be labeled as ‘‘cornstarch,’’ and the RS3 as ‘‘maltodextrin,’’<br />

both already recognizable terms on many ingredient legends. They compare<br />

well to several natural grain sources, contain little fat, are white in color,<br />

and neutral in flavor. A 1996 American Institute of Baking study (19) determined<br />

that although nearly one third of the resistant RS3 starch consumed is fermented,<br />

it produces essentially no energy value.<br />

Two fermentation-derived cellulosic thickeners and stabilizers were introduced<br />

in the latter part of the 90s. PrimaCel ® (Monsanto) is produced by the<br />

microbial fermentation of Acetobacter xylinum combined with sucrose and carboxymethylcellulose<br />

coagents to promote dispersion. The technology for this<br />

food cellulose, also known as ‘‘microfibrous cellulose,’’ was originally developed<br />

and patented by Weyerhaeuser Company. The product was previously known as<br />

Cellulon ® . A Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) petition was accepted for<br />

filing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1992. These fibers are extremely<br />

fine, with a 0.1-µm to 0.2-µm diameter, forming a strong, stable colloidal<br />

network. Another fermentation-derived gum has found some success in Japan<br />

and was recently given the green light in the United States. On December 16,<br />

1996, the FDA approved curdlan for use as a formulation aid, processing aid,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!