29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

482 Fry and Hoek<br />

achieved in 1995, when Fry and Van Soolingen (2) invented such a process and<br />

used it to produce a range of intense sweetener salts, including the first, unique<br />

crystals of aspartame-acesulfame. Patent applications on the Fry-Van Soolingen<br />

method have been filed widely, including in Europe (2) and the United States<br />

(3). Also the subject of patents is the aspartame-acesulfame compound itself.<br />

From all the possible sweetener-sweetener salts, this latter has become the leading<br />

candidate for full commercial production, and its introduction is being carried<br />

out by Holland Sweetener Company under their trademark Twinsweet.<br />

The reasons for marketing this particular salt are clear. First, there are the<br />

well-known advantages of blending aspartame with acesulfame-K. For example,<br />

in the case of liquid products, these two sweeteners together offer greater sweetness<br />

stability and longer shelf-life compared with aspartame alone. In addition,<br />

aspartame and acesulfame-K exhibit quantitative synergy, which means that,<br />

when used jointly, they are a more potent sweetener than would have been expected<br />

based on their properties used independently. Furthermore, the quality of<br />

sweetness is improved by blending the two. The best features of the sweetness<br />

profiles of each come to the fore when they are combined, and a favored blend<br />

to achieve this is 60:40 by weight of aspartame and acesulfame-K, respectively.<br />

This ratio happens to be equimolar (equal numbers of molecules of each) and is<br />

exactly the ratio in which the sweeteners appear in the aspartame-acesulfame<br />

salt.<br />

These quantitative and qualitative synergies between this pair of sweeteners<br />

have fostered an enormous growth in their joint use, as well as a general acceptance<br />

that blended sweetener systems can often offer the consumer a better taste<br />

than single sweeteners alone, however ‘‘sugarlike’’ the latter are claimed to be.<br />

Yet mechanical blends of aspartame and acesulfame-K are not without technological<br />

problems (4, 5). There are issues of dissolution time, hygroscopicity, and<br />

the homogeneity of powder mixes, all of which bear on the ease of use of physical<br />

mixtures of these sweeteners and the quality of consumer products made with<br />

them. In the creation of the novel crystalline form of Twinsweet, where aspartame<br />

and acesulfame are combined at the molecular level, these issues have been<br />

largely resolved.<br />

The way aspartame and acesulfame are combined in the salt gives rise to<br />

yet more advantages. For example, the molecular arrangement in such that, in<br />

the solid, access to the free amino group of the aspartyl moiety is hindered. The<br />

availability of this group is critical to the (in)stability of aspartame when used<br />

conventionally as a separate sweetener in certain low-moisture applications, such<br />

as sugar-free confectionery, especially chewing gum. Where these products include<br />

flavors high in aldehyde content, there is a risk that aspartame is degraded<br />

through reaction with the flavor. This can shorten the shelf-life unacceptably<br />

because there is simultaneous loss of both flavor and sweetness. The hindered<br />

structure of the solid aspartame-acesulfame salt, however, is less susceptible to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!