29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

292 Kato and Moskowitz<br />

The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) first<br />

reviewed maltitol in conjunction with hydrogenated starch hydrolysate in 1980,<br />

when it concluded that the allocation of an ‘‘acceptable daily intake (ADI) need<br />

not be specified’’ (39). A second review in 1983 resulted in the allocation of a<br />

temporary ADI of 0–25 mg/kg body weight for hydrogenated glucose syrups<br />

containing 50–90% maltitol, mainly because the panel did not have, but requested,<br />

the results of chronic feeding studies (41).<br />

In 1985, after the acquisition of lifetime feeding studies, JECFA reevaluated<br />

the toxicity of maltitol and HSH and reverted to an ADI of ‘‘not specified’’<br />

(31). As defined by JECFA, ADI ‘‘not specified’’ means that, ‘‘on the basis<br />

of available scientific data, the total daily intake of a substance arising from its<br />

use at levels necessary to achieve the desired effect, does not, in the opinion of<br />

the Committee, represent a hazard to health.’’ Therefore, establishment of an<br />

ADI in numerical terms was not necessary.<br />

Another group of scientists, the Scientific Committee for Food of the European<br />

Economic Community (EEC), in its December 1984 report on sweeteners,<br />

found maltitol to be ‘‘acceptable.’’ The committee found it inappropriate to establish<br />

an ADI for maltitol and other polyols (42).<br />

VIII. REGULATORY STATUS<br />

A. United States<br />

Towa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., filed a petition with the FDA on August 26,<br />

1986, to affirm the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of maltitol (23).<br />

The petition was accepted for filing on September 23, 1986, and was announced<br />

in the Federal Register on December 23, 1986.<br />

While the FDA is conducting their assessment of the petition, maltitol may<br />

be used in the United States, although potential customers should make their own<br />

assessment of the risk; that is, if the FDA rules adversely, products containing<br />

maltitol may need to be recalled from the marketplace. In this case, the risk<br />

is minimal, because maltitol is a principal component in hydrogenated starch<br />

hydrolysate (hydrogenated glucose syrup), which has been used in the United<br />

States since around 1977, and also the subject of a longstanding, prior FDA<br />

GRAS petition.<br />

The Towa petition asks for use of maltitol in a variety of applications,<br />

including as a flavoring agent, formulation aid, humectant, nutritive sweetener,<br />

processing aid, sequestrant, stabilizer and thickener, surface-finishing agent, and<br />

texturizer. The ingredient shall be used in food at levels not to exceed current<br />

good manufacturing practices: a maximum level of 99.5% in hard candy and<br />

cough drops, 99% in sugar substitutes, 85% in soft candy, 75% in chewing gum,<br />

55% in nonstandardized jams and jellies, and 30% in cookies and sponge cake.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!