29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

382 White and Osberger<br />

Table 6 Glycemic Index<br />

Glucose 100<br />

Sucrose 59 10<br />

Fructose 20 5<br />

Maltose 105 12<br />

Apples 39 3<br />

Raisins 64 11<br />

White bread 69 5<br />

Source: From Ref. 17.<br />

and glucose in subjects with reactive hypoglycemia was reported in Diabetes<br />

Care (30). The investigators determined that the use of 100-g loads of pure fructose<br />

as the sweetener in cakes and beverages or by itself resulted in a significantly<br />

reduced glycemic effect, as indicated by markedly less severe glucose and insulin<br />

responses. The authors concluded, ‘‘fructose may thus prove useful as a sweetening<br />

agent in the dietary treatment of selected patients with reactive hypoglycemia.’’<br />

VI. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF<br />

CRYSTALLINE FRUCTOSE<br />

Crystalline fructose was first promoted as a nutritionally beneficial sweetener by<br />

virtue of its unique metabolic disposition in the body. Early product formulations<br />

targeting diet and health-conscious consumers included powdered diet and sports<br />

beverages, nutritional candy bars, and specialty diabetic and dietetic food items.<br />

Breakthrough technology to crystallize fructose from HFCS feedstock was implemented<br />

in the mid-1980s, enabling large-scale and low-cost fructose production.<br />

Only then did formulation scientists attempt to integrate crystalline fructose into<br />

high-volume, mainstream food products.<br />

Providing incentive to alert food scientists looking for applications for crystalline<br />

fructose was a new class of dietetic foods defined by the U. S. Food and<br />

Drug Administration. Products in this class could be labeled ‘‘reduced calorie’’<br />

if they contained at least twenty-five percent fewer calories than their full-calorie<br />

counterpart (31). Crystalline fructose was immediately recognized as a critical<br />

ingredient in achieving the necessary reduction in sweetener calories (32). Substituting<br />

crystalline fructose for other sweeteners in existing formulas is not simply<br />

a case of plugging in a factor to determine the quantity of fructose required.<br />

Considerable food technology expertise is required to formulate reduced-calorie

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!