29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

492 Fry and Hoek<br />

are rapid dissolution, essential to meet consumer expectations of an instant product,<br />

and the homogeneity of the mix, which is essential to deliver reproducible<br />

product performance. In addition, there are factors that affect the manufacturer,<br />

such as ease of mixing of the ingredients and low dust content.<br />

Unfortunately, aspartame and acesulfame-K crystallize in different forms.<br />

Aspartame has needlelike crystals, whereas those of acesulfame-K are more cubic.<br />

This means it is technologically difficult to create and maintain mixtures of<br />

these sweeteners that are homogeneous and stay so throughout the manufacturing<br />

and retail chains. There is evidence that this difficulty influences the quality of<br />

powder products. Not only is there a tendency for the two conventional sweeteners<br />

to separate from each other, they can also redistribute themselves unevenly<br />

with respect to the other components of the mixture. For example, Hoek et al. (5)<br />

have shown that, in segregation tests of aspartame and acesulfame-K contained in<br />

a typical instant beverage powder, the sweeteners can separate to a degree that<br />

could be perceptible to consumers as differences in sweetness. In the aspartameacesulfame<br />

salt, however, the two sweeteners are combined at the molecular level<br />

and cannot be separated from each other until the moment they are dissolved.<br />

Moreover, the rapid dissolution of the salt (see Section V) means there is greater<br />

freedom to choose a particle size range that gives a mechanically stable, homogeneous<br />

mix. This is an advantage in comparison with aspartame, which dissolves<br />

relatively slowly, a factor that may drive the powder mix manufacturer to use<br />

very finely ground material to increase dissolution speed. Such fine powders bring<br />

other difficulties, however. These include a tendency to cohere, which means<br />

that finely-milled aspartame does not flow easily and can clump. Perversely, such<br />

clumps can act as very large particles and take an extended time to dissolve. The<br />

tendency to form clumps is made worse by the uptake of moisture, a process<br />

encouraged by the sweetener’s hygroscopicity. In contrast, the complete absence<br />

of significant hygroscopicity in the salt has already been noted.<br />

Comparative trials have been made of Twinsweet with an equisweet, equimolar<br />

physical blend of aspartame with acesulfame-K in a typical instant beverage<br />

mix (5). Under standardized mixing conditions, and in both tumbling and<br />

convective mixers, the sweetener-sweetener salt produced a more homogeneous<br />

mix, with coefficients of variation for the concentration of both sweetener components<br />

half those found with the blend. The mixture based on the salt was also<br />

much more resistant to segregation. In tests, columns of powder were deliberately<br />

vibrated to induce segregation and subsequently sectioned horizontally and analyzed.<br />

The spread of sweetness after this test is shown in Fig. 6, from which<br />

it can be seen that the sweetness of the product with Twinsweet is much more<br />

narrowly distributed than that using the blend. More particularly, the variation in<br />

concentration of the blend is likely to be perceptible to a proportion of consumers,<br />

whereas that of the aspartame-acesulfame salt is unlikely to be so detected.<br />

Naturally, although Twinsweet may be used in a powder mix solely because<br />

of its advantageous powder flow properties, its rapid dissolution is also of obvious

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!