29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sucralose 191<br />

fructose, and/or insulin secretion in healthy animals, and it was therefore predicted<br />

that no effect in these parameters would be seen in healthy human volunteers<br />

or individuals with diabetes. A clinical trial that used 1000 mg/day for 3<br />

months in healthy volunteers demonstrated no adverse effect on glucose homeostasis.<br />

Subsequent studies with individuals having type 1 or type 2 diabetes have<br />

shown no abnormalities in glucose control. The most important of these studies<br />

was a 3 month, five-center study, in which 136 patients were carefully evaluated<br />

and monitored following a protocol developed with regulatory authorities. After<br />

dosing with 667 mg/day for 3 months to individuals with type 2 diabetes, no<br />

adverse effect on glucose homeostasis was detected, particularly in parameters<br />

that monitored the long-term blood glucose levels.<br />

B. Regulatory Status<br />

Before the submission of the sucralose database to regulatory agencies, an independent<br />

panel of 16 internationally recognized scientific experts was asked to<br />

review the sucralose toxicological database and projected human intake data.<br />

They were to provide a detailed review on the adequacy of the toxicological data<br />

and evaluate the safety of sucralose for human consumption. The panel included<br />

experts in toxicology, oncogenicity, clinical toxicology, genetic toxicology, metabolism,<br />

biochemistry, reproductive toxicology, physiology, nutrition, hematology,<br />

pediatrics, risk assessment, neurotoxicology, and immunology. The expert<br />

panel on sucralose concluded that on the basis of the evaluation of the data presented<br />

to them and regulatory agencies and on the discussions and deliberations<br />

of the entire panel ‘‘sucralose is safe for its intended purpose of use’’ (7).<br />

Regulatory agencies around the world have concluded that sucralose is safe.<br />

At present, more than 40 countries and international bodies have endorsed the<br />

safety of sucralose, including. South Africa, Japan, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia,<br />

Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, and the United<br />

States. In June 1990, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives<br />

(JECFA), assigned a permanent Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for sucralose of<br />

15 mg/kg body weight/day. Because the Expected Daily Intake (EDI) for sucralose<br />

at the 90th percentile as determined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration<br />

(FDA) is 1.6 mg/kg/day (8), the assignment of an ADI value greater than<br />

2.0 mg/kg/day allows virtually unrestricted use of sucralose as a sweetener. The<br />

approval granted sucralose by the U.S. FDA in April 1998 was the broadest initial<br />

approval ever granted a new food additive. Subsequently, in August 1999, the<br />

FDA approved sucralose as a general-purpose sweetener.<br />

C. Cariogenicity<br />

Sprague-Dawley rats infected with Streptococcus mutans were provided with sucrose<br />

or sucralose along with a diet that contained no additional sucrose. After

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!