29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 Bopp and Price<br />

ied during the past 10–20 years. Since the widespread use of cyclamate in foods<br />

and beverages was restricted to a relatively short time span in many countries,<br />

these studies are more applicable to the assessment of the possible carcinogenicity<br />

of saccharin than cyclamate. However, the cyclamate issue was specifically addressed<br />

in some of the studies. The epidemiology studies with the noncaloric<br />

sweeteners have been reviewed by others (64–66), and it has generally been<br />

agreed that there is no conclusive evidence of an increased risk of bladder cancer<br />

associated with the use of these sweeteners.<br />

XIV. MUTAGENICITY<br />

In the 1960s and 1970s, the mutagenic potential of cyclamate and cyclohexylamine<br />

was evaluated in many different test systems, including the Ames test and<br />

other microbial gene mutation assays, studies in Drosophila, in vitro cytogenetic<br />

studies, in vivo cytogenetic studies with both somatic and germ cells, dominant<br />

lethal tests, and others. Although there were instances of conflicting or discordant<br />

results, the preponderance of evidence provided by this battery of tests suggested<br />

that neither cyclamate nor cyclohexylamine represented a significant mutagenic<br />

hazard (15, 67, 68). Nevertheless, in the 1980 decision the Commissioner of the<br />

FDA still concluded that ‘‘cyclamate has not been shown not to cause heritable<br />

genetic damage’’ (10).<br />

In 1985 the NAS Committee evaluated the mutagenicity tests with cyclamate<br />

and cyclohexylamine and found little evidence to conclude that either compound<br />

was a DNA-reactive carcinogen (60). They, however, recommended that<br />

additional tests for mammalian cell DNA damage, mammalian cell gene mutation<br />

tests, and more definitive cytogenetic studies be conducted to complete and<br />

strengthen the database for the two compounds. After consultation with the FDA,<br />

both calcium cyclamate and cyclohexylamine were tested in the Chinese hamster<br />

ovary HGPRT forward mutation assay, for unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat<br />

hepatocytes, and in the Drosophila sex-linked recessive lethal assay (69). The<br />

results of these three tests gave no evidence of any intrinsic genotoxicity from<br />

either compound. In addition, dominant lethal and heritable translocation tests<br />

were conducted in male mice given the maximal tolerated dose of calcium cyclamate<br />

for 6 weeks because the sodium salt had been used in almost all the previous<br />

studies with mammalian germ cells (70). The results of these two tests were<br />

also negative, indicating that the calcium salt did not induce any transmissible<br />

chromosomal aberrations in the germ cells of mice. Thus, these recent studies,<br />

performed according to the currently accepted standards, confirm the previous<br />

conclusions that cyclamate and cyclohexylamine are not mutagenic and do not<br />

cause heritable genetic damage.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!