29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overview 11<br />

the maximum dietary level of an additive demonstrating no toxic effects, a ‘‘no<br />

observable effect level’’ or NOEL. The NOEL is then used to determine the ADI.<br />

For example, if safety evaluation studies of a given substance demonstrate a<br />

NOEL of 1000 mg/kg, using a 100-fold safety factor the ADI would be 10 mg/<br />

kg body weight per day for humans.<br />

The ADI does not represent a maximum allowable daily intake level. It<br />

should not be regarded as a specific point at which safety ends and possible health<br />

concerns begin. In fact, the U.S. FDA has said it is not concerned that consumption<br />

occasionally may exceed the ADI. The agency has stressed that because the<br />

ADI has a built-in safety margin and is based on a chronic lifetime exposure,<br />

occasional consumption in amounts greater than the ADI ‘‘would not cause adverse<br />

effects’’ (15).<br />

VII. CONCLUSION<br />

Low-calorie products are in demand and consequently so are the ingredients that<br />

make them possible. With recent approvals more and more good-tasting products<br />

will become available. In the near future, additional products that are reduced in<br />

fat and calories, incorporating both fat replacers and low-calorie and reducedcalorie<br />

sweeteners are expected. With the increase in obesity in many parts of<br />

the world and as consumers become increasingly aware that ‘‘calories still<br />

count,’’ the number of successful light products should soar.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Light Products Usage and Weight Control Habits Survey. Conducted by Booth Research<br />

Services, Inc. for the Calorie Control Council, March, 1998.<br />

2. J Rice, et al. Rodent tumors of urinary bladder, renal cortex, and thyroid gland in<br />

IARC monographs evaluations of carcinogenic risk to humans. Toxicol Sci 49:166–<br />

171, 1999.<br />

3. JA Desor, O Maller, LS Green. Preference for sweet in humans. In: JM Weiffenbach,<br />

ed. Infants, Children and Adults in Taste and Development: The Genesis of Sweet<br />

Preference. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,<br />

1977, p 171.<br />

4. A Drewnowski. Sweetness and obesity. In: J Dobbing, ed. Sweetness. Berlin:<br />

Springer-Verlag, 1987.<br />

5. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Toxicological Evaluation<br />

of Certain Food Additives with a Review of General Principles and Specifications.<br />

Geneva: World Health Organization, 1974.<br />

6. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Procedural Manual. Rome: 5th ed. Food and Agricultural<br />

Organization of the United Nations, 1981, p 21.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!