29.03.2013 Views

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

Title: Alternative Sweeteners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

374 White and Osberger<br />

When aspartame received clearance for use in food products in 1981, it<br />

became the task of food scientists to determine precisely how to use this sugar<br />

substitute. Contrary to oft-expressed opinion, aspartame does not exhibit a sweetness<br />

profile exactly identical to that of sucrose. Some subtle organoleptic differences<br />

can be perceived, with the significance of these differences being dependent<br />

on the specific conditions under which the aspartame is used. Hyvonen in Finland<br />

(14) and Johnson in the United States (15) discovered that combinations of aspartame<br />

and crystalline fructose could be used to achieve a synergistic sweetening<br />

effect and to minimize any lingering, nonsweet flavors of aspartame.<br />

Thus, the sweetness synergy between fructose and other sweeteners offers<br />

formulators the choice of accepting finished products with greater sweetness or<br />

reducing sweetener levels and accepting ingredient cost savings. Blending fructose<br />

with reduced levels of high-intensity sweeteners has the added benefit of<br />

eliminating their bitter, metallic, or lingering aftertastes that are disagreeable to<br />

some consumers.<br />

D. Colligative Properties<br />

Fructose is a monosaccharide molecule with very different colligative properties<br />

than dextrose, another monosaccharide, or sucrose, a disaccharide. Colligative<br />

properties are those physical properties that depend solely on the concentration<br />

of particles in the specific system of interest. The concentration of particles, in<br />

turn, depends on the solubility and molecular weight of the particles.<br />

The solubility of fructose, sucrose, and dextrose versus temperature is illustrated<br />

in Fig. 2. Fructose is more soluble at all temperatures than either sucrose<br />

or dextrose. Because it is half the molecular weight of sucrose and possesses<br />

greater solubility, it is easy to understand how the concentration of particles and<br />

concomitant colligative properties are accentuated with fructose.<br />

Osmotic pressure, water activity, and freezing point depression are three<br />

colligative properties that are accentuated with fructose. Fructose creates higher<br />

osmotic pressure and lower water activity than sucrose, dextrose, or higher saccharides,<br />

resulting in greater product microbial stability. Fructose depresses the<br />

freezing point more than sucrose. When used in dairy desserts (both soft-serve<br />

and hard-frozen), the tendency of fructose to depress the freezing point can be<br />

countered with the addition of higher molecular weight corn sweeteners, gums,<br />

or stabilizers. The depressed freezing point is actually an asset when fructose is<br />

substituted for sucrose in frozen juice concentrates.<br />

E. Hygroscopicity and Humectancy<br />

Fructose is quicker to absorb moisture (hygroscopicity) and slower to release it<br />

to the environment (humectancy) than sucrose, dextrose, or other nutritive sweet-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!