05.06.2013 Views

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• localized motion of the elements in the direction<br />

normal to the plane of the shells<br />

• significant softening in the axial stiffness (change in<br />

axial force/end-feed displacement) indicating<br />

instability of the cross section under axial load.<br />

The combination of both high bending strain and high<br />

normal velocity is a strong indicator that unstable<br />

deformation is occurring. Elevated bending strain is<br />

allowed to occur alone when the tube wall bends to<br />

conform to the die surface. In that case, the bending<br />

strain would be high, but the element normal velocity<br />

low. Softening of the axial stiffness will also result when<br />

a full circumferential wrinkle forms. However, this may<br />

be suppressed if the tube is being formed into a<br />

nonsymmetric die such as a T-section. Therefore, an<br />

additional parameter is calculated to estimate the<br />

circumferential extent of the wrinkle. Rings of elements<br />

along the length of the forming tube are checked and the<br />

ratio of wrinkling elements (both high bending strain and<br />

normal velocity) divided by the total number of elements<br />

in the ring is calculated. A value of one indicates the full<br />

circumference is wrinkling.<br />

The test problem geometry (Figure 1a) involves forming a<br />

tube into a conical die shape. Because this tube is<br />

relatively short, wrinkling is the primary mode of axial<br />

instability (rather than buckling). Both the shell model<br />

and a finer axisymmetric two-dimensional model<br />

(Figure 1b) were used to test the control routine.<br />

Material Data and Constitutive Equations for Modeling<br />

Implementation<br />

The material data and associated constitutive equations<br />

required to develop accurate finite element models of the<br />

hydroforming process were investigated. Most aluminum<br />

alloys for hydroforming are produced by extrusion. The<br />

extrusion process normally results in tubular materials<br />

with crystallographic textures that have the primary slip<br />

planes oriented in particular directions. Therefore,<br />

extrusion produces a tube with the flow stress heavily<br />

dependent upon the direction of material loading. An<br />

experimental investigation of this material anisotropy was<br />

conducted with a typical extrusion material to develop an<br />

anisotropic yield criterion for use in the finite element<br />

model. A tube was instrumented with strain gauges to<br />

measure the circumferential and axial strain and was<br />

subjected to different stress ratios of axial load and<br />

internal pressure. These experiments were conducted on<br />

176 FY 2000 <strong>Laboratory</strong> Directed Research and Development Annual Report<br />

Figure 1. Tube formed into a conical die shape (top);<br />

Axisymmetry two-dimensional model (bottom)<br />

a new tube and the same tube after 15% plastic strain was<br />

applied. Comparison of the experimental data to an<br />

isotropic von Mises yield criteria showed that the flow<br />

stress is significantly anisotropic.<br />

Hydroforming may be performed using many different<br />

operating conditions. Therefore, a complete description<br />

of the formability of the material under different<br />

directions of loading is required. Biaxial stretching<br />

experiments were conducted on AA6061-T4 material to<br />

determine the forming limit diagram for the material. A<br />

sample population was subjected to a series of<br />

experiments to determine the level of plastic strain that<br />

developed under various ratios of internal pressure and<br />

axial load. A schematic of the experimental apparatus is<br />

shown in Figure 2, which also illustrates typical results<br />

for a single population of samples tested under free<br />

hydroforming conditions. The specimens are arranged in<br />

this figure such that the bottom specimen received the<br />

highest axial compression during testing, and the top<br />

specimen was a uniaxial tensile specimen (with no<br />

internal pressure). If axial compression was imposed on a<br />

tube specimen in excess of the specimens in Figure 2,<br />

buckling and wrinkling began to occur. Regions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!