05.06.2013 Views

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development and Validation of Mesocosms for Experimentally Investigating Carbon Dioxide<br />

Sequestration in Wetlands<br />

Study Control Number: PN00027/1434<br />

Ron Thom, Michael Huesemann, Dana Woodruff<br />

Carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas emitted by fossil fuel combustion and deforestation, adds annually about<br />

3.5 billion metric tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere. Soil carbon sequestration is needed to reduce accumulation of<br />

carbon in the atmosphere to reduce risks of climatic change. Restoration of wetlands, fertilization, hydrological<br />

manipulation, and other methods might allow wetlands to sequester an additional 0.1 to 0.7 billion metric tonness per<br />

year.<br />

Project Description<br />

Restoration of wetlands is a potental method for<br />

sequestering large amounts of carbon in the soil, thereby<br />

reducing accumulation of atmospheric carbon. Recently,<br />

the <strong>National</strong> Panel on Carbon Sequestration (Reichle et al.<br />

1999) estimated that wetland carbon sequestration could<br />

be substantially increased. Restoration may be the least<br />

costly and least uncertain alternative for sequestering<br />

carbon in wetlands. However, no comprehensive<br />

program has studied how such restorative actions affect<br />

carbon sequestration rates. This project examined the use<br />

of mesocosms to measure carbon sequestration in natural<br />

and restored wetlands. This study also demonstrated the<br />

use of mesocosms for evaluating enhanced carbon<br />

sequestration in wetlands, developed new methods for<br />

assessing soil organic carbon, and established the<br />

groundwork for verifying enhanced carbon sequestration<br />

via remote sensing on regional and larger scales. We<br />

conducted greenhouse experiments where hydrology and<br />

salinity were manipulated in small mesocosms, collected<br />

and analyzed soil samples from several restored and<br />

natural tidal marshes as well as eelgrass meadows of<br />

varying post-restoration age marshes, investigated the use<br />

of spectral radiance in monitoring differences in the<br />

amounts of carbon stored in wetland systems, and<br />

constructed a prototype automated gas flux mesocosm.<br />

Greenhouse mesocosms did not show increased total<br />

organic carbon content after a 5-month study period, but<br />

did show total organic carbon content similar to that of<br />

field-sampled plots. Total organic carbon measured from<br />

natural and restored marsh systems indicated that<br />

restoration of tidal flooding resulted in a recovery of soil<br />

total organic carbon to natural levels after about 10 years<br />

following restoration. Several indices used to measure<br />

crop stress and photosynthetic function were applied to<br />

our spectral reflectance data, including the normalized<br />

difference vegetation index, the red-edge vegetation stress<br />

index, and the photosynthetic reflectance index. The<br />

photosynthetic reflectance index appeared most promising<br />

and may be an indicator of photosynthetic radiation use<br />

and net CO2 uptake. Construction of the automated gas<br />

flux mesocosm was completed.<br />

Introduction<br />

No comprehensive studies have determined whether<br />

wetland restoration affects carbon sequestration rates.<br />

This project examined the use of mesocosms to measure<br />

carbon sequestration in natural and restored wetlands.<br />

We wanted to know how well mesocosms compare to<br />

field conditions and resolve differences in carbon<br />

sequestration. To this end, we tested the following<br />

hypotheses:<br />

Ho1: Organic carbon storage is the same in mesocosms<br />

as compared with natural wetland systems.<br />

Ho2: Restoration of hydrologically altered wetlands does<br />

not enhance carbon sequestration.<br />

Ho3: Spectral radiance does not differ between systems<br />

differing in carbon sequestration rate.<br />

We expected that the mesocosms would provide a good<br />

match to natural systems and that restoration would result<br />

in enhanced carbon sequestration.<br />

Approach<br />

The technical approach focused on five tasks that<br />

addressed our three hypotheses.<br />

Earth System Science 203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!