05.06.2013 Views

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1. Two different glucose fermentation setups for<br />

aeration/agitation: 500-mL blubbler flasks (top), and 250mL<br />

baffled shaker flasks (bottom)<br />

Biomass (g/mL/d)<br />

0.0004<br />

0.00035<br />

0.0003<br />

0.00025<br />

0.0002<br />

0.00015<br />

0.0001<br />

0.00005<br />

Change in Biomass over Time for Fungal Strain 13<br />

250 m l Experim ent"<br />

40 m L Experim ent"<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Time in Days<br />

Figure 2. Comparison of biomass for fungal strain 13 using<br />

two different fermentation methods<br />

The relative quantity of malonic acid in the cell-free<br />

extract of all fungal strains tested was variable between<br />

the two fermentation methods. Some cell-free extracts<br />

had increased quantities of malonic acid when the baffled<br />

flask was used, whereas other extracts showed increased<br />

malonic acid levels when bubbler flask was used. Table 1<br />

is a summary of relative malonic acid yield by both<br />

fermentation methods. The yields in cultures by both<br />

methods were low with respect to the amount of glucose<br />

present. Therefore, estimates of malonic acid yield in<br />

grams per liter could not be determined.<br />

72 FY 2000 <strong>Laboratory</strong> Directed Research and Development Annual Report<br />

Table 1. Summary of malonic acid presence in cell-free<br />

extract of selected fungal strains<br />

Species<br />

Shaker<br />

(40 mL)<br />

Bubbler<br />

(250 mL)<br />

Week 1<br />

H7 0 1<br />

F 3 3<br />

V 3 1,3<br />

C 0 1<br />

13 0 1,2<br />

Control NM NM<br />

Week 3<br />

CV 0 1<br />

X 0 1<br />

Control 0 1<br />

Week 4<br />

CC-2 0 0<br />

I 0 0<br />

M 0 0<br />

O 0 0<br />

NAM 0 0<br />

Control 0 0<br />

Week 5<br />

ZZZZ 0 0<br />

HC 0 0<br />

V8 0 0<br />

Z 0 0<br />

Control 0 0<br />

Week 6<br />

Y 0 0<br />

V 0 0<br />

Control 0 0<br />

Week 7<br />

Lp 0 0<br />

K 0 0<br />

0 = nondetect<br />

1 = S (spike)<br />

2 = SP (spike/peak)<br />

3 = P (peak)<br />

Control 0 0<br />

NM = not measured<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

The relative amount of malonic acid was estimated for<br />

20 fungal strains. The levels of malonic acid were<br />

relatively small, typically less than 0.1 g/L. From this<br />

data set, it does not appear that one fermentation method<br />

is more effective than the other for increasing the yield of<br />

malonic acid. However, overall biomass gain was slightly<br />

higher when the baffled flasks were used. Future work<br />

will apply methods to increase the yield of malonic acid<br />

and may involve preconditioning of strains on glucose<br />

and the addition of macro-and/or micronutrients to<br />

increase the robustness of the fungal strains. The results<br />

will form the basis for creating a process to produce<br />

malonic acid on larger scales with significant energy<br />

savings over those of current practices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!