05.06.2013 Views

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

PNNL-13501 - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to 300°C and 400°C. Unfortunately, the amount of tramp<br />

oxygen in the system was enough to allow oxidation of<br />

the fuel once the temperature approached 275°C, even<br />

with a 3% hydrogen gas mixture flowing through the<br />

system.<br />

Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis decomposition of<br />

metaschoepite at 300°C and 400°C<br />

X-ray diffraction of the samples after thermogravimetric<br />

analysis testing showed that the metaschoepite had been<br />

removed. However, dehydrated schoepite remained. It<br />

was not clear if the dehydrated schoepite was a<br />

decomposition product of the metaschoepite or if the<br />

decomposition product was UO3, which then readily<br />

rehydrates even at ambient conditions. A truly inert<br />

environment must be maintained, even for preparation of<br />

the x-ray diffraction sample to address this issue.<br />

Thermogravimetric analysis testing on the dehydrated<br />

schoepite demonstrated that even with temperatures of<br />

about 300°C for over 10 hours, this phase was not<br />

completely removed. Testing under more controlled<br />

conditions and under different atmospheres is necessary<br />

to optimize the method for removal of the hydrated<br />

phases.<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

Testing on unirradiated UO2 and spent fuel powders<br />

clearly demonstrated that hydrated phases formed rapidly<br />

under conditions expected under spent fuel pool storage.<br />

While the large surface area of the samples tested was a<br />

factor, the time in storage for spent fuel supported the<br />

conclusion that hydrates will form. The week-to-week<br />

fluctuations in the relative quantity of hydrated phases are<br />

not explained, but they raise the question as to whether<br />

hydrated phases are formed by a dissolution/<br />

reprecipitation reaction as assumed or if they are formed<br />

through direct reaction with the fuel. The stability of<br />

these hydrated phases, especially metaschoepite, in an<br />

aqueous environment was unresolved. The observation of<br />

floating phases raised questions regarding the expected<br />

transport of radionuclides from areas contaminated with<br />

uranium.<br />

Standard drying techniques that do not apply heat will not<br />

remove the absorbed water. Additional atmospheres must<br />

be tested to determine the conditions for removing<br />

hydrated phases from failed spent fuel rods.<br />

References<br />

CRWMS M&O. 2000. Clad Degradation-Dry<br />

Unzipping. ANL-EBS-MD-000013 REV00. Las Vegas,<br />

Nevada.<br />

Oliver BM, GS Klinger, J Abrefah, SC Marschman,<br />

PJ MacFarlan, and GA Ritter. 1998. Drying Results of<br />

K-Basin Fuel Element 1164M (Run 6). <strong>PNNL</strong>-11896,<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>Northwest</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>, Richland,<br />

Washington.<br />

Nuclear Science and Engineering 367

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!